HostTSLAC vs ICP — price, size and safety, side by side
TSLAC (Base) vs ICP (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
TSLAC vs ICP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| TSLAC | ICP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $372.17 | $3.27 |
| Market cap | $1.18M | $1.65B |
| 24h volume | $2.01M | $1.06M |
| Liquidity | $431.22K | $400.75K |
| FDV | $1.15M | $814.98K |
| Holders | 1,505 | 6,391 |
| Age (days) | 18 | 320 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ICP measures ~1,398× the market cap of TSLAC
- TSLAC measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of ICP
- ICP measures ~4.2× the holder count of TSLAC
- over the shared window TSLAC moved +1.22% while ICP moved +10.6%
What the data says
TSLAC
TSLAC on Base — 0xb2000000000000000000001e800a7f5189430cd0 — is the 0xb200… family's Tesla wrapper, priced $361.45 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot in line with the stock, on $431 thousand of liquidity and roughly $3.4 million of daily volume.
Tesla is the family's highest-beta member — the equity that retail tokenization was arguably invented for — and its wrapper runs the standard profile: eleven days old, turnover near 4.6x the pool. But this contract carries a second identity worth flagging on its own page: Base also hosts a different "Tesla - Tokenized" contract from another deployer, at a different address and a different price point entirely. Two tokenized Teslas on one chain is the wrapper category's core problem in miniature — the ticker tells you nothing about which claim you're buying.
ICP
ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $815.0 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.
The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $400.8 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TSLAC or ICP?
By tracked market cap: TSLAC (Base) measures $1.18M and ICP (Base) measures $1.65B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TSLAC or ICP?
On the contract checks we publish: TSLAC (Base) grades B and ICP (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TSLAC and ICP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show TSLAC at +1.22% and ICP at +10.6%.
More comparisons
TSLAC vs CRVUSDTSLAC vs TRIPLETTSLAC vs SNDKGMEX vs TSLACPAXG vs ICPICP vs BLACKGP vs ICPPOWER vs ICP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.