HostTSLAC vs CRVUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
TSLAC (Base) vs CRVUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
TSLAC vs CRVUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| TSLAC | CRVUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $372.17 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | $1.18M | $217.72M |
| 24h volume | $2.01M | $7.74M |
| Liquidity | $431.22K | $198.17M |
| FDV | $1.15M | $2.10B |
| Holders | 1,505 | 95,213 |
| Age (days) | 18 | 1,222 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRVUSD measures ~185× the market cap of TSLAC
- CRVUSD measures ~460× the liquidity of TSLAC
- CRVUSD measures ~3.8× the 24h volume of TSLAC
- CRVUSD measures ~63× the holder count of TSLAC
What the data says
TSLAC
TSLAC on Base — 0xb2000000000000000000001e800a7f5189430cd0 — is the 0xb200… family's Tesla wrapper, priced $361.45 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot in line with the stock, on $431 thousand of liquidity and roughly $3.4 million of daily volume.
Tesla is the family's highest-beta member — the equity that retail tokenization was arguably invented for — and its wrapper runs the standard profile: eleven days old, turnover near 4.6x the pool. But this contract carries a second identity worth flagging on its own page: Base also hosts a different "Tesla - Tokenized" contract from another deployer, at a different address and a different price point entirely. Two tokenized Teslas on one chain is the wrapper category's core problem in miniature — the ticker tells you nothing about which claim you're buying.
CRVUSD
CRVUSD is Curve's own stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited into Curve's LLAMMA system, which liquidates gradually across a price band instead of in a single cliff, the design that made it the DeFi stable built for volatile collateral. The deployment 0xf939e0a03fb07f59a73314e73794be0e57ac1b4e is the Ethereum mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $198.2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: LLAMMA's soft-liquidation is genuinely novel — collateral converts to crvUSD gradually as price falls, cushioning the cliff-edge failure mode other CDP systems have. The trade-off is that the peg's quality is a function of Curve's collateral book and liquidation engine rather than a fiat reserve — verifiable on-chain, never guaranteed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TSLAC or CRVUSD?
By tracked market cap: TSLAC (Base) measures $1.18M and CRVUSD (Ethereum) measures $217.72M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TSLAC or CRVUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: TSLAC (Base) grades B and CRVUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TSLAC and CRVUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show TSLAC at +2.97% and CRVUSD at −0.09%.
More comparisons
TSLAC vs TRIPLETTSLAC vs SNDKGMEX vs TSLACQUID vs TSLACFWWETH vs CRVUSDCRVUSD vs SASHIMIWBTC vs CRVUSDUSDC vs CRVUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.