HostPAXG vs ICP — price, size and safety, side by side
PAXG (Ethereum) vs ICP (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
PAXG vs ICP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| PAXG | ICP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.28K | $3.27 |
| Market cap | $1.86B | $1.65B |
| 24h volume | $1.17M | $1.06M |
| Liquidity | $20.43M | $400.75K |
| FDV | $1.85B | $814.98K |
| Holders | 88,116 | 6,391 |
| Age (days) | 334 | 320 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- PAXG measures ~51× the liquidity of ICP
- PAXG measures ~14× the holder count of ICP
- over the shared window PAXG moved −1.25% while ICP moved +10.6%
What the data says
PAXG
PAXG is Paxos's tokenized gold — each token a claim on one fine troy ounce held in LBMA vaults in London, making it the most direct on-chain gold exposure in this index. The deployment 0x45804880de22913dafe09f4980848ece6ecbaf78 is the canonical mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $20.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest frame is the custodial one: a PAXG is only as good as Paxos's vault attestations and redemption rails — Paxos is a NYDFS-regulated trust, which puts this in the "institutional-grade claim" bucket alongside USDC rather than the commodity-fantasy bucket — but it is still a claim, and redemption has minimums most wallets will never meet. The token tracks spot gold minus the custody premium; what it cannot track is the deep liquidity of actual gold markets.
ICP
ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $815.0 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.
The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $400.8 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PAXG or ICP?
By tracked market cap: PAXG (Ethereum) measures $1.86B and ICP (Base) measures $1.65B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PAXG or ICP?
On the contract checks we publish: PAXG (Ethereum) grades B and ICP (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PAXG and ICP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show PAXG at −1.25% and ICP at +10.6%.
More comparisons
OLD SLERF vs PAXGPAXG vs USDMPAXG vs JUPUSDVVV vs PAXGICP vs BLACKGP vs ICPPOWER vs ICPBEER vs ICP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.