HostTFUSD vs 龙虾 — price, size and safety, side by side
TFUSD (BNB Chain) vs 龙虾 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26T06:07:05 / 2026-09-26.
TFUSD vs 龙虾 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| TFUSD | 龙虾 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9996 | $0.1034 |
| Market cap | — | $255.30M |
| 24h volume | $2.11M | $6.84M |
| Liquidity | $2.57M | $2.46M |
| FDV | $216.90M | $255.30M |
| Holders | 3,953 | 90,082 |
| Age (days) | 33 | 206 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- 龙虾 measures ~3.2× the 24h volume of TFUSD
- 龙虾 measures ~23× the holder count of TFUSD
What the data says
TFUSD
TFUSD — Treuhand Finanzgruppe USD — is a 33-day-old BNB Chain dollar token at 0x1794f2bb542c28c4cf14872c39c2e31f740dd102, priced at a fully diluted $216.9 million across 3,953 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The market side is the deepest in this batch: $2.6 million of tracked pool liquidity is real depth, and $2.1 million of daily volume keeps it honest. The contract read keeps one live lever — the token can still mint new supply, so circulation is a floor — while it cannot pause or blacklist, source is verified, and the top ten wallets hold about 34.1% of supply.
龙虾
The token at 0xeccbb861c0dda7efd964010085488b69317e4444 — tickered 龙虾 ("lobster") — is a BNB Chain community asset 206 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $255.3 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is thin for a quarter-billion float: $2.5 million of tracked depth on $6.8 million of 24-hour volume — a tape cycling nearly three times the pool daily. That profile — high cap, thin measured book, heavy turnover — is the one where the pool number matters most, because it bounds what an on-chain exit of any size can actually clear. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TFUSD or 龙虾?
By tracked market cap: TFUSD (BNB Chain) measures — and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) measures $255.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TFUSD or 龙虾?
On the contract checks we publish: TFUSD (BNB Chain) grades B and 龙虾 (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TFUSD and 龙虾 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show TFUSD at 0.00% and 龙虾 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
TFUSD vs USDXNVDAB vs TFUSDTFUSD vs SHIBSYRUPUSDC vs TFUSD龙虾 vs SKHYSURPLUS vs 龙虾龙虾 vs ALETH龙虾 vs SAVAX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.