HostSURPLUS vs GITLAWB — price, size and safety, side by side
SURPLUS (Base) vs GITLAWB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
SURPLUS vs GITLAWB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SURPLUS | GITLAWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00007181 | $0.00004567 |
| Market cap | $10.70M | $6.09M |
| 24h volume | $912.43K | $1.50M |
| Liquidity | $2.51M | $1.90M |
| FDV | $10.70M | $6.05M |
| Holders | 6,651 | 11,544 |
| Age (days) | 128 | 194 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- SURPLUS measures ~1.8× the market cap of GITLAWB
- GITLAWB measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of SURPLUS
- GITLAWB measures ~1.7× the holder count of SURPLUS
- over the shared window SURPLUS moved −32.9% while GITLAWB moved −25.1%
What the data says
SURPLUS
SURPLUS at 0xc52aedec3374422d7510e294cfaa90799595cba3 — styled Surplus Intelligence — is a young Base asset just 128 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $10.7 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
What separates this row from the average young Base book is the pool: $2.5 million of tracked depth is deep relative to a $10.7 million cap — nearly a quarter of the valuation is matched by the exit book — on $912.4 thousand of 24-hour volume, an unusually busy tape for the age. The contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
GITLAWB
GITLAWB at 0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3 is a Base asset 194 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $6.1 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
The book is unusually liquid for the cap: $1.9 million of tracked depth is deep — nearly a third of the valuation — and the $1.5 million daily volume nearly cycles the whole pool every day, a genuinely active tape rather than a dormant holding. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SURPLUS or GITLAWB?
By tracked market cap: SURPLUS (Base) measures $10.70M and GITLAWB (Base) measures $6.09M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SURPLUS or GITLAWB?
On the contract checks we publish: SURPLUS (Base) grades B and GITLAWB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SURPLUS and GITLAWB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SURPLUS at −32.9% and GITLAWB at −25.1%.
More comparisons
ADI vs SURPLUSSHIB vs SURPLUSSURPLUS vs 龙虾USDX vs SURPLUSGITLAWB vs MONGITLAWB vs NVDACGITLAWB vs FETTROLL vs GITLAWB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.