HostSUPER vs QI — price, size and safety, side by side
SUPER (Avalanche) vs QI (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SUPER vs QI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| SUPER | QI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.212 | $0.003043 |
| Market cap | $135.71M | $21.91M |
| 24h volume | $114.21K | $329.99K |
| Liquidity | $414.89K | $252.82K |
| FDV | $1.09M | $21.91M |
| Holders | 4,108 | 39,637 |
| Age (days) | 430 | 1,820 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SUPER measures ~6.2× the market cap of QI
- SUPER measures ~1.6× the liquidity of QI
- QI measures ~2.9× the 24h volume of SUPER
- QI measures ~9.6× the holder count of SUPER
- over the shared window SUPER moved +44.7% while QI moved +116%
What the data says
SUPER
SUPER at 0x09fa58228bb791ea355c90da1e4783452b9bd8c3 is the Avalanche deployment of the SuperVerse token — the gaming-ecosystem asset carried here as a bridged book 430 days into its record. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices the 5.0 million local units at $1.1 million fully diluted, inside the asset-wide $135.7 million market cap — a sliver of the headline float lives on this chain.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The local book is small and top-heavy: 4,108 holders with the ten largest wallets at 88.6% of supply, and $414.9 thousand of thin tracked depth on $28.5 thousand of daily volume.
QI
QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $21.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $252.8 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUPER or QI?
By tracked market cap: SUPER (Avalanche) measures $135.71M and QI (Avalanche) measures $21.91M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUPER or QI?
On the contract checks we publish: SUPER (Avalanche) grades A and QI (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUPER and QI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show SUPER at +44.7% and QI at +116%.
More comparisons
CRV vs SUPERSUPER vs VELVETHIMS vs SUPERPRL vs SUPERQI vs STRCXCYBERLEEK vs QIQI vs AAVE.ENODAL vs QI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.