HostSQD vs SOL — price, size and safety, side by side
SQD (Arbitrum) vs SOL (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SQD vs SOL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| SQD | SOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03036 | $121.60 |
| Market cap | $39.68M | $70.79B |
| 24h volume | $3.38K | $4.48B |
| Liquidity | $226.13K | $959.88M |
| FDV | $40.29M | $76.46B |
| Holders | 17,095 | 3,820,662 |
| Age (days) | 809 | — |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- SOL measures ~1,784× the market cap of SQD
- SOL measures ~4,245× the liquidity of SQD
- SOL measures ~1,322,948× the 24h volume of SQD
- SOL measures ~223× the holder count of SQD
- over the shared window SQD moved +9.22% while SOL moved +2.23%
What the data says
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $39.7 million market cap prices nearly all of the $40.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $226.1 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SOL
Wrapped SOL is the one token on this site that is barely a token at all. SOL itself — the coin that pays for every transaction on Solana — is not an SPL token, so any program that expects the SPL standard works with this wrapper instead: one wSOL always represents one SOL, held in a token account you can unwrap back to native SOL at any moment. When a DEX route, a lending pool, or a liquidity pair says "SOL," this mint — So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112 — is almost always what it means under the hood.
The safety read here is about as clean as the format allows, and for a structural reason rather than a flattering one. As of the September 26, 2026 snapshot both the mint authority and the freeze authority read revoked: nobody can print unbacked wSOL, and nobody can freeze a wallet's balance. That isn't a team making good choices — it's baked into how the wrapper works, which is exactly why wrapped SOL is the reference point other tokens get measured against. The snapshot puts roughly 3.82 million holders on the mint and about $960 million of tracked liquidity, numbers no ordinary SPL token approaches.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SQD or SOL?
By tracked market cap: SQD (Arbitrum) measures $39.68M and SOL (Solana) measures $70.79B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SQD or SOL?
On the contract checks we publish: SQD (Arbitrum) grades D and SOL (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SQD and SOL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show SQD at +9.22% and SOL at +2.23%.
More comparisons
UNIBTC vs SQDLASO vs SQDSQD vs CRVSQD vs RHEASOL vs WETHSOL vs WBNBSOL vs USDTUSDC vs SOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.