Open app

SQD vs ETHFI — price, size and safety, side by side

SQD (Arbitrum) vs ETHFI (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.

SQDD

$0.03036
Subsquid on Arbitrum
Trade SQD
vs

ETHFIB

$0.7507
ether.fi governance token on Arbitrum
Trade ETHFI

SQD vs ETHFI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18

100 — shared start
SQD +9.22%  ·  ETHFI −0.39% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
SQDETHFI
Price$0.03036$0.7507
Market cap$39.68M$724.73M
24h volume$3.38K$70.41K
Liquidity$226.13K$204.18K
FDV$40.29M$5.64M
Holders17,09523,598
Age (days)8096
Safety gradeDB

Where they differ

What the data says

SQD

SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $39.7 million market cap prices nearly all of the $40.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.

The book is thin for the cap: $226.1 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full SQD safety read →

ETHFI

ETHFI at 0x7189fb5b6504bbff6a852b13b7b82a3c118fdc27 is ether.fi's governance token on Arbitrum — a record only six days old at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, one of the youngest books in the tracked corpus. The asset-wide $724.7 million market cap towers over the $5.6 million fully-diluted figure priced on 7.5 million local units.

The week-old book is thin but trading: $204.2 thousand of tracked depth on $58.2 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full ETHFI safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, SQD or ETHFI?

By tracked market cap: SQD (Arbitrum) measures $39.68M and ETHFI (Arbitrum) measures $724.73M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, SQD or ETHFI?

On the contract checks we publish: SQD (Arbitrum) grades D and ETHFI (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have SQD and ETHFI performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show SQD at +9.22% and ETHFI at −0.39%.

More comparisons

UNIBTC vs SQDLASO vs SQDSQD vs CRVSQD vs RHEAETHFI vs STNKCLASH vs ETHFIBILLY vs ETHFIETHFI vs LV

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.