HostRENBTC vs QUICK — price, size and safety, side by side
RENBTC (Polygon) vs QUICK (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
RENBTC vs QUICK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RENBTC | QUICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.88K | $0.01112 |
| Market cap | $25.27M | $6.31M |
| 24h volume | $13.86K | $19.39K |
| Liquidity | $440.43K | $267.93K |
| FDV | $490.34K | $7.39M |
| Holders | 1,941 | 53,996 |
| Age (days) | 1,333 | 1,439 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RENBTC measures ~4.0× the market cap of QUICK
- RENBTC measures ~1.6× the liquidity of QUICK
- QUICK measures ~28× the holder count of RENBTC
- over the shared window RENBTC moved +5.06% while QUICK moved +16.2%
What the data says
RENBTC
RENBTC at 0xdbf31df14b66535af65aac99c32e9ea844e14501 is the wrapped-bitcoin claim the Ren bridge issued on Polygon — an asset whose issuing bridge wound down years ago, and whose remains still carry a live page in this index. The September 26, 2026 snapshot's silhouette says the service era ended: a local supply of 6 tokens worth $490.3 thousand fully diluted, against a $25.3 million asset-wide market cap that counts every chain's leftovers.
What remains is a residual book: 1,941 wallets still hold a slice, the ten largest hold 96.7% of supply, and $440.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $13.9 thousand of daily volume. The contract is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can still be swapped after deployment, a flag that matters more on an asset whose operator stepped away than on one still maintained.
QUICK
QUICK at 0xb5c064f955d8e7f38fe0460c556a72987494ee17 is QuickSwap's exchange token on Polygon, 1,439 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $6.3 million market cap prices most of the $7.4 million fully-diluted figure on 880.0 million units — the float is largely out.
The book is workable for a token this size: $267.9 thousand of tracked depth on $19.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — a quiet but real venue token pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENBTC or QUICK?
By tracked market cap: RENBTC (Polygon) measures $25.27M and QUICK (Polygon) measures $6.31M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENBTC or QUICK?
On the contract checks we publish: RENBTC (Polygon) grades B and QUICK (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENBTC and QUICK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RENBTC at +5.06% and QUICK at +16.2%.
More comparisons
RENBTC vs UVMRENBTC vs VOLLARRENBTC vs APXUSDDADDY vs RENBTCBTR vs QUICKQUICK vs INJQUICK vs GMONUSDUC vs QUICK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.