HostRENBTC vs MEBT — price, size and safety, side by side
RENBTC (Polygon) vs MEBT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
RENBTC vs MEBT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RENBTC | MEBT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.88K | $3.08 |
| Market cap | $25.27M | $4.23M |
| 24h volume | $13.86K | $117.54K |
| Liquidity | $440.43K | $263.02K |
| FDV | $490.34K | $4.20M |
| Holders | 1,941 | 6,886 |
| Age (days) | 1,333 | 108 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RENBTC measures ~6.0× the market cap of MEBT
- RENBTC measures ~1.7× the liquidity of MEBT
- MEBT measures ~8.5× the 24h volume of RENBTC
- MEBT measures ~3.5× the holder count of RENBTC
What the data says
RENBTC
RENBTC at 0xdbf31df14b66535af65aac99c32e9ea844e14501 is the wrapped-bitcoin claim the Ren bridge issued on Polygon — an asset whose issuing bridge wound down years ago, and whose remains still carry a live page in this index. The September 26, 2026 snapshot's silhouette says the service era ended: a local supply of 6 tokens worth $490.3 thousand fully diluted, against a $25.3 million asset-wide market cap that counts every chain's leftovers.
What remains is a residual book: 1,941 wallets still hold a slice, the ten largest hold 96.7% of supply, and $440.4 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $13.9 thousand of daily volume. The contract is a measured upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can still be swapped after deployment, a flag that matters more on an asset whose operator stepped away than on one still maintained.
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot — with 6,886 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $263.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENBTC or MEBT?
By tracked market cap: RENBTC (Polygon) measures $25.27M and MEBT (Polygon) measures $4.23M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENBTC or MEBT?
On the contract checks we publish: RENBTC (Polygon) grades B and MEBT (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENBTC and MEBT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RENBTC at +5.06% and MEBT at +1.40%.
More comparisons
RENBTC vs UVMRENBTC vs VOLLARRENBTC vs APXUSDDADDY vs RENBTCMEBT vs CLAWNES vs MEBTMEBT vs BEEMEBT vs KITTY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.