HostRDNT vs GHO — price, size and safety, side by side
RDNT (Arbitrum) vs GHO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
RDNT vs GHO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RDNT | GHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0004521 | $0.9996 |
| Market cap | $688.76K | $697.96M |
| 24h volume | $1.39K | $1.72M |
| Liquidity | $61.05K | $26.48M |
| FDV | $459.55K | $697.96M |
| Holders | 101,322 | 8,133 |
| Age (days) | — | 368 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- GHO measures ~1,013× the market cap of RDNT
- GHO measures ~434× the liquidity of RDNT
- GHO measures ~1,238× the 24h volume of RDNT
- RDNT measures ~12× the holder count of GHO
- over the shared window RDNT moved −5.68% while GHO moved +0.11%
What the data says
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $688.8 thousand market cap across 101,322 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $61.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
GHO
GHO is Aave's native stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited in the Aave protocol, with its monetary policy governed by Aave governance. The contract 0x40d16fc0246ad3160ccc09b8d0d3a2cd28ae6c2f is what our scan tracks: $26.5 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: GHO is overcollateralized-debt stablecoin design — borrowers mint it against Aave collateral, so its backing is the health of Aave's markets rather than a bank account. Peg deviations are the figure to watch: a stablecoin that trades below peg is the market pricing the collateral-and-arbitrage machinery's speed, and GHO's history includes real time spent under a dollar before stabilizers matured.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RDNT or GHO?
By tracked market cap: RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $688.76K and GHO (Ethereum) measures $697.96M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RDNT or GHO?
On the contract checks we publish: RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C and GHO (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RDNT and GHO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RDNT at −5.68% and GHO at +0.11%.
More comparisons
ETHFI vs RDNTEXA vs RDNTRDNT vs 114514RDNT vs GIKOUSD1 vs GHOTBTC vs GHOGHO vs UNIGHO vs FRXUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.