HostRAIN vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
RAIN (Arbitrum) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
RAIN vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RAIN | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01271 | $9.63 |
| Market cap | $9.02B | $5.60B |
| 24h volume | $1.25M | $5.14M |
| Liquidity | $673.53K | $25.55M |
| FDV | $14.52B | $8.01B |
| Holders | 173,887 | 382,165 |
| Age (days) | 337 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RAIN measures ~1.6× the market cap of UNI
- UNI measures ~38× the liquidity of RAIN
- UNI measures ~4.1× the 24h volume of RAIN
- UNI measures ~2.2× the holder count of RAIN
- over the shared window RAIN moved +0.53% while UNI moved +38.5%
What the data says
RAIN
RAIN is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum trading on real depth: the contract 0x25118290e6a5f4139381d072181157035864099d is what our scan tracks, with $674 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026.
The honest note is about verifiability rather than the project: tokens in this tier have shallow public documentation, and our scan's read is primarily on-chain — the pool is real and functional, but verify the project's identity and contract ownership through its official channels before treating the liquidity as endorsement. Arbitrum hosts a long tail of tokens that look similar in a scan.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RAIN or UNI?
By tracked market cap: RAIN (Arbitrum) measures $9.02B and UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RAIN or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: RAIN (Arbitrum) grades B and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RAIN and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RAIN at +0.53% and UNI at +38.5%.
More comparisons
B3 vs RAINRAIN vs SANCUSDT.E vs RAINUMBRA vs RAINUNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.