HostQUICK vs MEBT — price, size and safety, side by side
QUICK (Polygon) vs MEBT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
QUICK vs MEBT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| QUICK | MEBT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01112 | $3.08 |
| Market cap | $6.31M | $4.23M |
| 24h volume | $19.39K | $117.54K |
| Liquidity | $267.93K | $263.02K |
| FDV | $7.39M | $4.20M |
| Holders | 53,996 | 6,886 |
| Age (days) | 1,439 | 108 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MEBT measures ~6.1× the 24h volume of QUICK
- QUICK measures ~7.8× the holder count of MEBT
- over the shared window QUICK moved +16.2% while MEBT moved +1.40%
What the data says
QUICK
QUICK at 0xb5c064f955d8e7f38fe0460c556a72987494ee17 is QuickSwap's exchange token on Polygon, 1,439 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $6.3 million market cap prices most of the $7.4 million fully-diluted figure on 880.0 million units — the float is largely out.
The book is workable for a token this size: $267.9 thousand of tracked depth on $19.4 thousand of 24-hour volume — a quiet but real venue token pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot — with 6,886 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $263.0 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUICK or MEBT?
By tracked market cap: QUICK (Polygon) measures $6.31M and MEBT (Polygon) measures $4.23M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUICK or MEBT?
On the contract checks we publish: QUICK (Polygon) grades A and MEBT (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUICK and MEBT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show QUICK at +16.2% and MEBT at +1.40%.
More comparisons
BTR vs QUICKQUICK vs INJQUICK vs GMONUSDUC vs QUICKMEBT vs CLAWNES vs MEBTMEBT vs BEEMEBT vs KITTY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.