HostQQQB vs SLC — price, size and safety, side by side
QQQB (BNB Chain) vs SLC (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
QQQB vs SLC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| QQQB | SLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $744.76 | $6.47 |
| Market cap | $1.35M | $54.28M |
| 24h volume | $8.33M | $1.72M |
| Liquidity | $8.25M | $5.06M |
| FDV | $56.98M | $71.89M |
| Holders | 301,385 | 20,069 |
| Age (days) | 73 | 71 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- SLC measures ~40× the market cap of QQQB
- QQQB measures ~1.6× the liquidity of SLC
- QQQB measures ~4.8× the 24h volume of SLC
- QQQB measures ~15× the holder count of SLC
- over the shared window QQQB moved +2.45% while SLC moved −35.1%
What the data says
QQQB
QQQB at 0x205812cdbed920aff76c6580abd681a46d11efc7 — deployed as "Invesqo QQQ" — is a very young BNB Chain asset: 73 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The name borrows the shape of a well-known index ticker; nothing in the measured data says what it tracks, so the name is a label, not a description.
The numbers contradict each other in instructive ways: a $1.4 million market cap on 78.3 thousand units against a $57.0 million fully-diluted figure — a float that is a sliver of the total supply — while $8.2 million of deep tracked depth outweighs the entire cap and the $8.3 million daily volume nearly matches the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SLC
SLC at 0x8ac96df1d3dbd7c99a54cb4e50599ce129015e50 — styled StarLink — is a very young BNB Chain book: 71 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 20,069 holders sharing an 11.1 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the priced float is what the pools and the book say it is.
The grading pulls in opposite directions. For depth, $5.1 million of tracked liquidity is deep — the best absolute pool in this batch — on $1.7 million of 24-hour volume. Against it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted — and the ten largest wallets hold 99.7% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book behind a wide holder count. Freeze authority is revoked, and the contract is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QQQB or SLC?
By tracked market cap: QQQB (BNB Chain) measures $1.35M and SLC (BNB Chain) measures $54.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QQQB or SLC?
On the contract checks we publish: QQQB (BNB Chain) grades B and SLC (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QQQB and SLC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show QQQB at +2.45% and SLC at −35.1%.
More comparisons
IBS vs QQQBBABYDOGE vs QQQBETH vs QQQBQQQB vs EUROCPOPCAT vs SLCONYC vs SLCSLC vs PENGUSLC vs ARGUS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.