HostSLC vs PENGU — price, size and safety, side by side
SLC (BNB Chain) vs PENGU (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
SLC vs PENGU — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| SLC | PENGU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.47 | $0.0101 |
| Market cap | $54.28M | $776.51M |
| 24h volume | $1.72M | $19.04M |
| Liquidity | $5.06M | $5.00M |
| FDV | $71.89M | $776.51M |
| Holders | 20,069 | 559,492 |
| Age (days) | 71 | — |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- PENGU measures ~14× the market cap of SLC
- PENGU measures ~11× the 24h volume of SLC
- PENGU measures ~28× the holder count of SLC
- over the shared window SLC moved 0.00% while PENGU moved +13.2%
What the data says
SLC
SLC at 0x8ac96df1d3dbd7c99a54cb4e50599ce129015e50 — styled StarLink — is a very young BNB Chain book: 71 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 20,069 holders sharing an 11.1 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the priced float is what the pools and the book say it is.
The grading pulls in opposite directions. For depth, $5.1 million of tracked liquidity is deep — the best absolute pool in this batch — on $1.7 million of 24-hour volume. Against it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted — and the ten largest wallets hold 99.7% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book behind a wide holder count. Freeze authority is revoked, and the contract is not a proxy.
PENGU
PENGU is what happens when an NFT brand outgrows its JPEGs. Pudgy Penguins spent years building the rare thing in crypto — mainstream distribution, from viral GIF packs to toys on retail shelves — and in December 2024 attached a token to that brand with one of the widest airdrops Solana has hosted. As of the September 26, 2026 snapshot, PENGU carries roughly $776.5 million of market capitalization across 559,492 holders at mint 2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv.
The chain-level mechanics read clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Supply is fixed at what exists, and no authority can freeze a wallet out of selling — the two structural failures behind most of the losses this site documents, both absent here. A holder base above half a million wallets, seeded by the airdrop, means ownership is broad in a way most brand tokens never achieve; broad bases don't prevent drawdowns, but they make single-wallet price control much harder.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SLC or PENGU?
By tracked market cap: SLC (BNB Chain) measures $54.28M and PENGU (Solana) measures $776.51M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SLC or PENGU?
On the contract checks we publish: SLC (BNB Chain) grades C and PENGU (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SLC and PENGU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show SLC at 0.00% and PENGU at +13.2%.
More comparisons
POPCAT vs SLCONYC vs SLCSLC vs ARGUSSLC vs ANTHROPICPENGU vs ARGUSPENGU vs ANTHROPICPENGU vs METPOPCAT vs PENGU
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.