Open app

IBS vs QQQB — price, size and safety, side by side

IBS (BNB Chain) vs QQQB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.

IBSC

$8.32
IBS on BNB Chain
Trade IBS
vs

QQQBB

$744.76
Invesqo QQQ on BNB Chain
Trade QQQB

IBS vs QQQB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24

100 — shared start
IBS −10.9%  ·  QQQB +2.45% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
IBSQQQB
Price$8.32$744.76
Market cap$23.92M$1.35M
24h volume$934.39K$8.33M
Liquidity$8.36M$8.25M
FDV$23.80M$56.98M
Holders227,215301,385
Age (days)15273
Safety gradeCB

Where they differ

What the data says

IBS

IBS at 0x255e746abb8d9acac00d6d023e5e63e3b8dfa7cd is a young BNB Chain asset — 152 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $23.9 million market cap across a compact 2.6 million supply.

The pool is the standout read in this batch: $8.4 million of tracked depth is deep — a third of the entire market cap sits in the exit book, a ratio most mid-caps never approach. The $934.4 thousand of daily volume is proportionate rather than frenzied. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption this page makes.

Full IBS safety read →

QQQB

QQQB at 0x205812cdbed920aff76c6580abd681a46d11efc7 — deployed as "Invesqo QQQ" — is a very young BNB Chain asset: 73 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The name borrows the shape of a well-known index ticker; nothing in the measured data says what it tracks, so the name is a label, not a description.

The numbers contradict each other in instructive ways: a $1.4 million market cap on 78.3 thousand units against a $57.0 million fully-diluted figure — a float that is a sliver of the total supply — while $8.2 million of deep tracked depth outweighs the entire cap and the $8.3 million daily volume nearly matches the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full QQQB safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, IBS or QQQB?

By tracked market cap: IBS (BNB Chain) measures $23.92M and QQQB (BNB Chain) measures $1.35M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, IBS or QQQB?

On the contract checks we publish: IBS (BNB Chain) grades C and QQQB (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have IBS and QQQB performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show IBS at −10.9% and QQQB at +2.45%.

More comparisons

BABYDOGE vs IBSETH vs IBSUSDE vs IBSUSDC vs IBSBABYDOGE vs QQQBETH vs QQQBQQQB vs EUROCUSDE vs QQQB

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.