HostQ vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
Q (BNB Chain) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
Q vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| Q | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02155 | $0.00002624 |
| Market cap | $114.08M | $7.83K |
| 24h volume | $2.98M | $1.35M |
| Liquidity | $376.64K | $345.10K |
| FDV | $127.28M | $26.24M |
| Holders | 18,986 | 1,815,204 |
| Age (days) | 386 | 5 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- Q measures ~14,575× the market cap of 果蝇
- Q measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~96× the holder count of Q
- over the shared window Q moved −15.4% while 果蝇 moved 0.00%
What the data says
Q
Q at 0xc07e1300dc138601fa6b0b59f8d0fa477e690589 — Quack AI Token — is a 386-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $114.1 million asset-wide market cap against a $127.3 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is hot: $376.6 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool eight times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
FAQ
Which is bigger, Q or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: Q (BNB Chain) measures $114.08M and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, Q or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: Q (BNB Chain) grades B and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have Q and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show Q at −15.4% and 果蝇 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
AUSD vs QKLED vs QQ vs COQQ vs GOHOMEHLX vs 果蝇OMFG vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LSK果蝇 vs ORCA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.