HostHLX vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
HLX (Ethereum) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
HLX vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| HLX | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04932 | $0.00002624 |
| Market cap | $4.88B | $7.83K |
| 24h volume | $763.76K | $1.35M |
| Liquidity | $345.50K | $345.10K |
| FDV | $4.88B | $26.24M |
| Holders | 5,246 | 1,815,204 |
| Age (days) | 67 | 5 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- HLX measures ~623,967× the market cap of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of HLX
- 果蝇 measures ~346× the holder count of HLX
What the data says
HLX
HLX — Helix Token on Ethereum, 0x28d4e499c4cde621e1cea7c9cbf9d43bf75a9525 — is a two-month-old token holding $345 thousand of liquidity in the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with roughly $764 thousand of daily volume.
Helix is a recycled name in crypto — it has served as the ticker for a DEX, an exchange, and several unrelated tokens across cycles. On Ethereum the collision matters less than on-chain identity: the contract above is the asset this page tracks, and any other "Helix" is a different instrument.
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
FAQ
Which is bigger, HLX or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: HLX (Ethereum) measures $4.88B and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, HLX or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: HLX (Ethereum) grades A and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have HLX and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show HLX at 0.00% and 果蝇 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
OMFG vs HLXHLX vs LSKHLX vs ORCAHLX vs OTCOMFG vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LSK果蝇 vs ORCA果蝇 vs OTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.