HostOMFG vs 果蝇 — price, size and safety, side by side
OMFG (Solana) vs 果蝇 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
OMFG vs 果蝇 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| OMFG | 果蝇 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2108 | $0.00002624 |
| Market cap | $2.82M | $7.83K |
| 24h volume | $35.04K | $1.35M |
| Liquidity | $346.05K | $345.10K |
| FDV | $2.82M | $26.24M |
| Holders | 1,742 | 1,815,204 |
| Age (days) | — | 5 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- OMFG measures ~361× the market cap of 果蝇
- 果蝇 measures ~39× the 24h volume of OMFG
- 果蝇 measures ~1,042× the holder count of OMFG
- over the shared window OMFG moved +17.8% while 果蝇 moved 0.00%
What the data says
OMFG
OMFG is the token of Omnipair — a Solana DeFi protocol for generalized asset pairing and leveraged positions, launched through the MetaDAO futarchy system its vanity mint signals. The mint omfgRBnxHsNJh6YeGbGAmWenNkenzsXyBXm3WDhmeta is what our scan tracks: $2.8 million market cap, $346 thousand of liquidity and 1,742 holders as of September 26, 2026 — an unusually deep pool against a small cap.
The honest shape: a real protocol (Omnipair handles permissionless pair lending on Solana) governed through MetaDAO's futarchy markets — meaning its roadmap is literally decided by prediction markets, which is either the most honest governance model in the corpus or the most volatile one, depending on your read. The concentrated holder count under two thousand is the practical flag beside the excellent liquidity.
果蝇
果蝇 — "fruit fly" in Chinese — at 0x209e487f1c2637ddf1f1b3f7d88a19068626b70b is a five-day-old BNB Chain deployment whose headline number demands a second look: 1,815,204 recorded wallets against a market cap of $7.8 thousand and a fully diluted figure of $26.2 million on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
A holder count that large against a four-figure valuation is the signature of an airdrop-shaped distribution — dust scattered across hundreds of thousands of addresses, not organic demand — and the concentration read agrees: the top ten wallets hold 100% of the supply, so the 1.8 million "holders" carry amounts too small to matter. The tracked book, $345.1 thousand of pool liquidity, is real but thin against the FDV.
FAQ
Which is bigger, OMFG or 果蝇?
By tracked market cap: OMFG (Solana) measures $2.82M and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) measures $7.83K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, OMFG or 果蝇?
On the contract checks we publish: OMFG (Solana) grades A and 果蝇 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have OMFG and 果蝇 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show OMFG at +17.8% and 果蝇 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
OMFG vs HLXOMFG vs LSKUAI vs OMFGOMFG vs ORCAHLX vs 果蝇果蝇 vs LSK果蝇 vs ORCA果蝇 vs OTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.