HostPROS vs AMZNC — price, size and safety, side by side
PROS (Base) vs AMZNC (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
PROS vs AMZNC — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| PROS | AMZNC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.6105 | $249.85 |
| Market cap | $2.59M | $1.46M |
| 24h volume | $667.49K | $2.68M |
| Liquidity | $574.79K | $537.11K |
| FDV | $2.59M | $1.46M |
| Holders | 3,879 | 1,967 |
| Age (days) | 131 | 18 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- PROS measures ~1.8× the market cap of AMZNC
- AMZNC measures ~4.0× the 24h volume of PROS
- PROS measures ~2.0× the holder count of AMZNC
- over the shared window PROS moved +43.7% while AMZNC moved −1.43%
What the data says
PROS
PROS — Wrapped PROS on Base, 0x8b7dde054be9d180c1be7fae0874697374a49832 — is the wrapped form of a token with a real home elsewhere: PROS is the Prosper/Prosper-predict ecosystem token, and a wrapped ERC-20 on Base is the cross-chain form of it. The September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $575 thousand of liquidity and roughly $2.7 million of daily volume.
A wrapped token's risk model differs from a native one: the honest questions are which bridge or custodian mints the wrapper, whether the canonical contract is the one at this address, and what the redemption path back to the native asset looks like. $0.44 per token across 103 days of tracked age describes a wrapper with a sustained market — the depth to trade, and the standing caveat that wrapper integrity is only as good as its bridge.
AMZNC
AMZNC on Base — 0xb200000000000000000000d9192b6b456483c2e8 — is the 0xb200… family's Amazon wrapper: $253.49 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, tracking the stock, on $537 thousand of liquidity and roughly $5.0 million of daily volume. Eleven days old, ~5x turnover — the family's hot-start signature.
With seven family members now indexed, the pattern worth stating is portfolio-level: the family is building a tokenized S&P basket on Base — Tesla, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, MicroStrategy, SpaceX, Sandisk — all from one deployer. That concentration is the family's real risk model: not seven independent counterparty questions but one issuer question asked nine times. If the issuer's custody arrangement is sound, the family is uniformly sound; if it isn't, the family fails together.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PROS or AMZNC?
By tracked market cap: PROS (Base) measures $2.59M and AMZNC (Base) measures $1.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PROS or AMZNC?
On the contract checks we publish: PROS (Base) grades B and AMZNC (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PROS and AMZNC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show PROS at +43.7% and AMZNC at −1.43%.
More comparisons
PROS vs FBOMBPROS vs MORCROSS vs PROSTUNA vs PROSIDOL vs AMZNCUNI vs AMZNCAAVE vs AMZNCAMZNC vs WNUSDT0
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.