HostPOOLS vs GOOGLC — price, size and safety, side by side
POOLS (Base) vs GOOGLC (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
POOLS vs GOOGLC — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| POOLS | GOOGLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001002 | $343.55 |
| Market cap | — | $2.15M |
| 24h volume | $9.15M | $3.78M |
| Liquidity | $950.09K | $849.76K |
| FDV | — | $2.15M |
| Holders | 4,477 | 5,894 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 39 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- POOLS measures ~2.4× the 24h volume of GOOGLC
What the data says
POOLS
POOLS on Base — 0x350131e02222326439bdbb866d05441732b49b07 — is a name that describes its own plumbing: a token called POOLS trading in pools. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $950 thousand of liquidity and roughly $9.2 million of daily volume.
At ~9.6x daily turnover, POOLS sits in the hot middle of the Base cohort — above organic-holder flow, below the mirrored-clone extremes. No age figure, holder data, or project information accompanies the row; the sub-cent price and the pool depth describe a momentum instrument doing exactly what its name implies — being traded in and out of liquidity.
GOOGLC
GOOGLC on Base — 0xb2000000000000000000002d0ba3164cc74f58b7 — presents itself as a tokenized Alphabet share: named "Alphabet Inc.", priced at $349.12 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot — tracking the equity — with $850 thousand of liquidity and roughly $12.1 million of daily volume.
The address tells the structural story: this contract and its sibling AAPL share the 0xb200… vanity prefix, meaning one issuer deploys the family. That is the standard shape of a tokenized-equity product — a wrapper claiming to track the stock — and it makes the counterparty question the entire question. A tokenized share is only the issuer's promise that a real share backs it; on-chain data can verify the pool, the transfers, and the price, but never the brokerage account off-chain where the backing supposedly sits.
FAQ
Which is bigger, POOLS or GOOGLC?
By tracked market cap: POOLS (Base) measures — and GOOGLC (Base) measures $2.15M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, POOLS or GOOGLC?
On the contract checks we publish: POOLS (Base) grades A and GOOGLC (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have POOLS and GOOGLC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show POOLS at 0.00% and GOOGLC at +0.75%.
More comparisons
POOLS vs FWOGPOOLS vs AMWBTCPOOLS vs TOSHICOOL vs POOLSGOOGLC vs RISELINK vs GOOGLCOPENAI vs GOOGLCGOOGLC vs AEON
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.