HostPOOLS vs AMWBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
POOLS (Base) vs AMWBTC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
POOLS vs AMWBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| POOLS | AMWBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001002 | $81.05K |
| Market cap | — | $5.14M |
| 24h volume | $9.15M | $13.74K |
| Liquidity | $950.09K | $943.43K |
| FDV | — | $5.03M |
| Holders | 4,477 | 9,807 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 1,518 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- POOLS measures ~666× the 24h volume of AMWBTC
- AMWBTC measures ~2.2× the holder count of POOLS
What the data says
POOLS
POOLS on Base — 0x350131e02222326439bdbb866d05441732b49b07 — is a name that describes its own plumbing: a token called POOLS trading in pools. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $950 thousand of liquidity and roughly $9.2 million of daily volume.
At ~9.6x daily turnover, POOLS sits in the hot middle of the Base cohort — above organic-holder flow, below the mirrored-clone extremes. No age figure, holder data, or project information accompanies the row; the sub-cent price and the pool depth describe a momentum instrument doing exactly what its name implies — being traded in and out of liquidity.
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $943 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
FAQ
Which is bigger, POOLS or AMWBTC?
By tracked market cap: POOLS (Base) measures — and AMWBTC (Polygon) measures $5.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, POOLS or AMWBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: POOLS (Base) grades A and AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have POOLS and AMWBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show POOLS at 0.00% and AMWBTC at 0.00%.
More comparisons
POOLS vs FWOGTOSHI vs POOLSCOOL vs POOLSTOLLY vs POOLSFWOG vs AMWBTCTOSHI vs AMWBTCCOOL vs AMWBTCTOLLY vs AMWBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.