Open app

PENGU vs SHIB — price, size and safety, side by side

PENGU (Solana) vs SHIB (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.

PENGUA

$0.004856
Pudgy Penguins on Solana
Trade PENGU
vs

SHIBA

$0.000004288
SHIBA INU on Ethereum
Trade SHIB

PENGU vs SHIB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58

100 — shared start
PENGU −29.4%  ·  SHIB −25.3% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
PENGUSHIB
Price$0.004856$0.000004288
Market cap$514.95M$2.71B
24h volume$111.14M all venues$63.63M all venues
Liquidity$2.11M$2.09M
FDV$514.95M$4.59B
Holders563,5551,703,814
Age (days)—1,728
Safety gradeAA

Where they differ

What the data says

PENGU

PENGU is what happens when an NFT brand outgrows its JPEGs. Pudgy Penguins spent years building the rare thing in crypto — mainstream distribution, from viral GIF packs to toys on retail shelves — and in December 2024 attached a token to that brand with one of the widest airdrops Solana has hosted. As of the November 6, 2026 snapshot, PENGU carries roughly $514.9 million of market capitalization across 563,555 holders at mint 2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv.

The chain-level mechanics read clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Supply is fixed at what exists, and no authority can freeze a wallet out of selling — the two structural failures behind most of the losses this site documents, both absent here. A holder base above half a million wallets, seeded by the airdrop, means ownership is broad in a way most brand tokens never achieve; broad bases don't prevent drawdowns, but they make single-wallet price control much harder.

Full PENGU safety read →

SHIB

SHIBA INU at 0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce is the original self-styled dogecoin killer on Ethereum and one of the widest-held tokens anywhere: 1,703,814 wallets at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. This page's job is less to explain a meme than to read a very large, very old market structure honestly.

The contract side is as clean as a token gets: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, the source is verified, and it sits on a major security registry's trust list. The creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply. The honest caveat is market-side, not contract-side: $2.1 million of tracked liquidity against a $2.7 billion market cap is large in dollars but thin against the token's own size — size an exit against the pool, not the cap. The ten largest wallets hold about 64% of supply, heavy even for a top-cap meme.

Full SHIB safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, PENGU or SHIB?

By tracked market cap: PENGU (Solana) measures $514.95M and SHIB (Ethereum) measures $2.71B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, PENGU or SHIB?

On the contract checks we publish: PENGU (Solana) grades A and SHIB (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have PENGU and SHIB performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show PENGU at −29.4% and SHIB at −25.3%.

More comparisons

PENGU vs CBETHPENGU vs SYRUPUSDCPENGU vs USDTPENGU vs USD0SHIB vs CBETHSHIB vs SYRUPUSDCSHIB vs USDTSHIB vs USD0

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.