NexSHIB vs SYRUPUSDC — price, size and safety, side by side
SHIB (Ethereum) vs SYRUPUSDC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
SHIB vs SYRUPUSDC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| SHIB | SYRUPUSDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000004288 | $1.19 |
| Market cap | $2.71B | $72.92M |
| 24h volume | $63.63M all venues | $2.71M all venues |
| Liquidity | $2.09M | $7.89M |
| FDV | $4.59B | $72.92M |
| Holders | 1,703,814 | 4,074 |
| Age (days) | 1,728 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SHIB measures ~37× the market cap of SYRUPUSDC
- SYRUPUSDC measures ~3.8× the liquidity of SHIB
- SHIB measures ~23× the 24h volume of SYRUPUSDC
- SHIB measures ~418× the holder count of SYRUPUSDC
- over the shared window SHIB moved −25.3% while SYRUPUSDC moved +0.70%
What the data says
SHIB
SHIBA INU at 0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce is the original self-styled dogecoin killer on Ethereum and one of the widest-held tokens anywhere: 1,703,814 wallets at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. This page's job is less to explain a meme than to read a very large, very old market structure honestly.
The contract side is as clean as a token gets: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, the source is verified, and it sits on a major security registry's trust list. The creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply. The honest caveat is market-side, not contract-side: $2.1 million of tracked liquidity against a $2.7 billion market cap is large in dollars but thin against the token's own size — size an exit against the pool, not the cap. The ten largest wallets hold about 64% of supply, heavy even for a top-cap meme.
SYRUPUSDC
Syrup USDC on Solana is Maple Finance's yield-bearing dollar bridged to this chain — the deposit token that earns institutional lending yield while circulating as a stable unit, one of the "your stablecoin pays you" class. The mint AvZZF1YaZDziPY2RCK4oJrRVrbN3mTD9NL24hPeaZeUj is the Solana deployment; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $7.9 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: syrupUSDC's yield comes from Maple's lending book — real borrower demand paying real interest, which is a step up from incentive-printed yield — but it means the token's return is only as good as Maple's loan underwriting, and the bridged Solana form adds the bridge's custody between the holder and that book. The A grade covers the Solana contract state; the lending book is an off-chain fact.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHIB or SYRUPUSDC?
By tracked market cap: SHIB (Ethereum) measures $2.71B and SYRUPUSDC (Solana) measures $72.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHIB or SYRUPUSDC?
On the contract checks we publish: SHIB (Ethereum) grades A and SYRUPUSDC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHIB and SYRUPUSDC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show SHIB at −25.3% and SYRUPUSDC at +0.70%.
More comparisons
PENGU vs SHIBSHIB vs CBETHSHIB vs USDTSHIB vs USD0SKY vs SYRUPUSDCSYRUPUSDC vs KBTCSYRUPUSDC vs USDCSYRUPUSDC vs EUROC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.