NexPENGU vs USD0++ — price, size and safety, side by side
PENGU (Solana) vs USD0++ (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.
PENGU vs USD0++ — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| PENGU | USD0++ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.004856 | $0.9736 |
| Market cap | $514.95M | $498.06M |
| 24h volume | $111.14M all venues | $8.48M all venues |
| Liquidity | $2.11M | $5.28M |
| FDV | $514.95M | $497.44M |
| Holders | 563,555 | 2,713 |
| Age (days) | — | 528 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- USD0++ measures ~2.5× the liquidity of PENGU
- PENGU measures ~13× the 24h volume of USD0++
- PENGU measures ~208× the holder count of USD0++
- over the shared window PENGU moved −26.0% while USD0++ moved +0.21%
What the data says
PENGU
PENGU is what happens when an NFT brand outgrows its JPEGs. Pudgy Penguins spent years building the rare thing in crypto — mainstream distribution, from viral GIF packs to toys on retail shelves — and in December 2024 attached a token to that brand with one of the widest airdrops Solana has hosted. As of the November 6, 2026 snapshot, PENGU carries roughly $514.9 million of market capitalization across 563,555 holders at mint 2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv.
The chain-level mechanics read clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Supply is fixed at what exists, and no authority can freeze a wallet out of selling — the two structural failures behind most of the losses this site documents, both absent here. A holder base above half a million wallets, seeded by the airdrop, means ownership is broad in a way most brand tokens never achieve; broad bases don't prevent drawdowns, but they make single-wallet price control much harder.
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $5.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PENGU or USD0++?
By tracked market cap: PENGU (Solana) measures $514.95M and USD0++ (Ethereum) measures $498.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PENGU or USD0++?
On the contract checks we publish: PENGU (Solana) grades A and USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PENGU and USD0++ performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show PENGU at −26.0% and USD0++ at +0.21%.
More comparisons
PENGU vs SHIBPENGU vs CBETHPENGU vs SYRUPUSDCPENGU vs USDTSPX vs USD0++USD0++ vs JLPAERO vs USD0++USD0++ vs LBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.