HostPEAR vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
PEAR (Arbitrum) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
PEAR vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| PEAR | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03808 | $9.63 |
| Market cap | $19.57M | $5.60B |
| 24h volume | $90.37K | $5.14M |
| Liquidity | $714.58K | $25.55M |
| FDV | $32.45M | $8.01B |
| Holders | 2,400 | 382,165 |
| Age (days) | 725 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~286× the market cap of PEAR
- UNI measures ~36× the liquidity of PEAR
- UNI measures ~57× the 24h volume of PEAR
- UNI measures ~159× the holder count of PEAR
What the data says
PEAR
PEAR at 0x3212dc0f8c834e4de893532d27cc9b6001684db0 is an Arbitrum asset 725 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $19.6 million market cap with a $32.5 million fully-diluted figure on 852.2 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is workable for the cap: $714.6 thousand of tracked depth on $58.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that clears ordinary size and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption here.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PEAR or UNI?
By tracked market cap: PEAR (Arbitrum) measures $19.57M and UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PEAR or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: PEAR (Arbitrum) grades A and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PEAR and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show PEAR at +9.20% and UNI at +6.71%.
More comparisons
PEAR vs GMEPEAR vs DESPXAPEAR vs LFIAVA vs PEARUNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.