NexORDER vs GHO — price, size and safety, side by side
ORDER (Arbitrum) vs GHO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.
ORDER vs GHO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| ORDER | GHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0274 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | $14.15M | $698.88M |
| 24h volume | $5.80M all venues | $6.97M all venues |
| Liquidity | $96.23K | $25.56M |
| FDV | $297.75K | $698.88M |
| Holders | 6,656 | 8,156 |
| Age (days) | 431 | 386 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GHO measures ~49× the market cap of ORDER
- GHO measures ~266× the liquidity of ORDER
- over the shared window ORDER moved −23.2% while GHO moved +0.24%
What the data says
ORDER
ORDER at 0x4e200fe2f3efb977d5fd9c430a41531fb04d97b8 is the Arbitrum deployment of Orderly Network's token, 431 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $14.1 million market cap sits far above a $297.8 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 11.3 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $96.2 thousand of tracked depth on $32.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working but modest slice. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GHO
GHO is Aave's native stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited in the Aave protocol, with its monetary policy governed by Aave governance. The contract 0x40d16fc0246ad3160ccc09b8d0d3a2cd28ae6c2f is what our scan tracks: $25.6 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: GHO is overcollateralized-debt stablecoin design — borrowers mint it against Aave collateral, so its backing is the health of Aave's markets rather than a bank account. Peg deviations are the figure to watch: a stablecoin that trades below peg is the market pricing the collateral-and-arbitrage machinery's speed, and GHO's history includes real time spent under a dollar before stabilizers matured.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ORDER or GHO?
By tracked market cap: ORDER (Arbitrum) measures $14.15M and GHO (Ethereum) measures $698.88M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ORDER or GHO?
On the contract checks we publish: ORDER (Arbitrum) grades B and GHO (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ORDER and GHO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show ORDER at −23.2% and GHO at +0.24%.
More comparisons
ORDER vs WLDLDO vs ORDERAVAX vs ORDERORDER vs USDEGHO vs CIRBTCGHO vs SUSDEGHO vs VVVGHO vs PAXG
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.