NexGHO vs VVV — price, size and safety, side by side
GHO (Ethereum) vs VVV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-14.
GHO vs VVV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| GHO | VVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $19.08 |
| Market cap | $698.88M | $1.11B |
| 24h volume | $6.97M all venues | $45.99M all venues |
| Liquidity | $25.56M | $20.26M |
| FDV | $698.88M | $1.85B |
| Holders | 8,156 | 156,807 |
| Age (days) | 386 | 176 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- VVV measures ~1.6× the market cap of GHO
- VVV measures ~6.6× the 24h volume of GHO
- VVV measures ~19× the holder count of GHO
- over the shared window GHO moved +0.29% while VVV moved −7.00%
What the data says
GHO
GHO is Aave's native stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited in the Aave protocol, with its monetary policy governed by Aave governance. The contract 0x40d16fc0246ad3160ccc09b8d0d3a2cd28ae6c2f is what our scan tracks: $25.6 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: GHO is overcollateralized-debt stablecoin design — borrowers mint it against Aave collateral, so its backing is the health of Aave's markets rather than a bank account. Peg deviations are the figure to watch: a stablecoin that trades below peg is the market pricing the collateral-and-arbitrage machinery's speed, and GHO's history includes real time spent under a dollar before stabilizers matured.
VVV
VVV is Venice.ai's token — Erik Voorhees' uncensored-AI platform, where staking VVV buys a share of the platform's inference capacity rather than a pure governance claim. The contract 0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $20.3 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The honest read: VVV is unusual among AI tokens for having a concrete utility loop — stake, get API quota — so its demand partly tracks actual inference usage rather than pure narrative. The counterweights are the usual: a single-platform dependency, and the fact that "uncensored" positioning is both the moat and the regulatory question. A utility token on a real product is still a utility token.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHO or VVV?
By tracked market cap: GHO (Ethereum) measures $698.88M and VVV (Base) measures $1.11B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHO or VVV?
On the contract checks we publish: GHO (Ethereum) grades B and VVV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHO and VVV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show GHO at +0.29% and VVV at −7.00%.
More comparisons
GHO vs CIRBTCGHO vs SUSDEGHO vs PAXGGHO vs PEPESUSDE vs VVVVVV vs PAXGCIRBTC vs VVVVVV vs PEPE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.