NexGHO vs CIRBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
GHO (Ethereum) vs CIRBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-13.
GHO vs CIRBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| GHO | CIRBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $69.82K |
| Market cap | $698.88M | $440.49M |
| 24h volume | $6.97M all venues | $19.85M all venues |
| Liquidity | $25.56M | $20.97M |
| FDV | $698.88M | $28.76M |
| Holders | 8,156 | — |
| Age (days) | 386 | 23 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GHO measures ~1.6× the market cap of CIRBTC
- CIRBTC measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of GHO
- over the shared window GHO moved +0.24% while CIRBTC moved −14.0%
What the data says
GHO
GHO is Aave's native stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited in the Aave protocol, with its monetary policy governed by Aave governance. The contract 0x40d16fc0246ad3160ccc09b8d0d3a2cd28ae6c2f is what our scan tracks: $25.6 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: GHO is overcollateralized-debt stablecoin design — borrowers mint it against Aave collateral, so its backing is the health of Aave's markets rather than a bank account. Peg deviations are the figure to watch: a stablecoin that trades below peg is the market pricing the collateral-and-arbitrage machinery's speed, and GHO's history includes real time spent under a dollar before stabilizers matured.
CIRBTC
CIRBTC — "Circle Wrapped Bitcoin" on Ethereum, contract 0x72dfb2e44f59c5ad2bafe84314e5b99a7cd5075e — is a token trading at $81,230 per unit — essentially bitcoin's spot price — with an enormous $21.0 million liquidity pool, ~$10.7 million of daily volume, and a $440.5 million market cap across a 948.75-unit circulating supply in the November 6, 2026 snapshot.
The critical question is the name's claim: Circle issues USDC and EURC, and as of this row's data no widely-documented "Circle Wrapped Bitcoin" product exists — Coinbase's cbBTC and BitGo's WBTC are the dominant wrappers. A token pricing itself at BTC's value while claiming Circle issuance is either an emerging legitimate product or a premium-grade impersonation, and the difference is everything.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHO or CIRBTC?
By tracked market cap: GHO (Ethereum) measures $698.88M and CIRBTC (Ethereum) measures $440.49M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHO or CIRBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: GHO (Ethereum) grades B and CIRBTC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHO and CIRBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show GHO at +0.24% and CIRBTC at −14.0%.
More comparisons
GHO vs SUSDEGHO vs VVVGHO vs PAXGGHO vs PEPECIRBTC vs SUSDECIRBTC vs VVVCIRBTC vs PAXGCIRBTC vs PEPE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.