HostNEAR vs FUSE — price, size and safety, side by side
NEAR (Ethereum) vs FUSE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
NEAR vs FUSE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| NEAR | FUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.87 | $0.003135 |
| Market cap | $15.74M | $2.02M |
| 24h volume | $995.23K | $1.55M |
| Liquidity | $420.92K | $326.08K |
| FDV | $15.78M | $2.02M |
| Holders | 14,552 | 1,626 |
| Age (days) | 904 | 4 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- NEAR measures ~7.8× the market cap of FUSE
- FUSE measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of NEAR
- NEAR measures ~8.9× the holder count of FUSE
- over the shared window NEAR moved +15.9% while FUSE moved +7.53%
What the data says
NEAR
NEAR at 0x85f17cf997934a597031b2e18a9ab6ebd4b9f6a4 is the Ethereum-issued claim on the NEAR asset — a wrapped deployment 904 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $15.7 million market cap across 3.8 million local units.
The tape outpaces the book: $995.2 thousand of 24-hour volume against $420.9 thousand of workable tracked depth — turnover above twice the pool daily, the signature of an asset that clears through routed flow rather than deep standing liquidity. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FUSE
FUSE is the token of Fuse Network — a payments-focused EVM chain that has been building merchant and stablecoin-payment tooling since before "payments chain" was a trend. The contract 0x126f5ece91d971f8ad62fa4fc1054456b8bd1111 is what our scan tracks: $326 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: Fuse is a long-running niche chain in the most contested lane in crypto — payments — competing against both crypto-native stablecoin rails and the incumbent card networks everyone claims to disrupt. The token is a bet on its specific merchant footprint compounding, and the modest pool means that bet is sized at small-cap terms.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NEAR or FUSE?
By tracked market cap: NEAR (Ethereum) measures $15.74M and FUSE (Ethereum) measures $2.02M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NEAR or FUSE?
On the contract checks we publish: NEAR (Ethereum) grades B and FUSE (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NEAR and FUSE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show NEAR at +15.9% and FUSE at +7.53%.
More comparisons
NEAR vs PRLNEAR vs HIMSNEAR vs CRVNEAR vs SUPERMSUSD vs FUSEXBT vs FUSELAVA vs FUSERENDER vs FUSE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.