HostMSUSD vs FUSE — price, size and safety, side by side
MSUSD (Base) vs FUSE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
MSUSD vs FUSE — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MSUSD | FUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.8929 | $0.003135 |
| Market cap | $46.17M | $2.02M |
| 24h volume | $845.54K | $1.55M |
| Liquidity | $3.41M | $326.08K |
| FDV | $17.09M | $2.02M |
| Holders | 5,541 | 1,626 |
| Age (days) | 656 | 4 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- MSUSD measures ~23× the market cap of FUSE
- MSUSD measures ~10× the liquidity of FUSE
- FUSE measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of MSUSD
- MSUSD measures ~3.4× the holder count of FUSE
- over the shared window MSUSD moved +29.0% while FUSE moved 0.00%
What the data says
MSUSD
msUSD is Metronome Synth's synthetic dollar — you deposit volatile collateral (ETH, BTC wrappers) into the Synth engine and mint dollar-denominated synthetic positions against it. The contract 0x526728dbc96689597f85ae4cd716d4f7fccbae9d is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $3.4 million of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026.
The honest note, stated plainly: a synthetic dollar is not a stablecoin — msUSD can and does trade off its one-dollar mark (our current read shows it well below), because its price is set by pool dynamics and mint-redemption incentives, not by an issuer redeeming at par. That is a different risk class from USDC or USDT — hold it as a leveraged-collateral instrument, not as cash.
FUSE
FUSE is the token of Fuse Network — a payments-focused EVM chain that has been building merchant and stablecoin-payment tooling since before "payments chain" was a trend. The contract 0x126f5ece91d971f8ad62fa4fc1054456b8bd1111 is what our scan tracks: $326 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: Fuse is a long-running niche chain in the most contested lane in crypto — payments — competing against both crypto-native stablecoin rails and the incumbent card networks everyone claims to disrupt. The token is a bet on its specific merchant footprint compounding, and the modest pool means that bet is sized at small-cap terms.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MSUSD or FUSE?
By tracked market cap: MSUSD (Base) measures $46.17M and FUSE (Ethereum) measures $2.02M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MSUSD or FUSE?
On the contract checks we publish: MSUSD (Base) grades B and FUSE (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MSUSD and FUSE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MSUSD at +29.0% and FUSE at 0.00%.
More comparisons
POD vs MSUSDMSUSD vs PENDLEMSUSD vs WBTCMSUSD vs GULDXBT vs FUSELAVA vs FUSERENDER vs FUSEFUSE vs 蝴蝶人生
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.