HostLAVA vs FUSE — price, size and safety, side by side
LAVA (Arbitrum) vs FUSE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
LAVA vs FUSE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LAVA | FUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01349 | $0.003135 |
| Market cap | $8.18M | $2.02M |
| 24h volume | $13.56K | $1.55M |
| Liquidity | $331.36K | $326.08K |
| FDV | $2.75M | $2.02M |
| Holders | 4,745 | 1,626 |
| Age (days) | 286 | 4 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- LAVA measures ~4.0× the market cap of FUSE
- FUSE measures ~114× the 24h volume of LAVA
- LAVA measures ~2.9× the holder count of FUSE
What the data says
LAVA
LAVA at 0x11e969e9b3f89cb16d686a03cd8508c9fc0361af is an Arbitrum deployment of the Lava Network token, 286 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $8.2 million market cap sits above the $2.8 million fully-diluted figure priced on 203.4 million local units.
The local book is workable against the slice: $331.4 thousand of tracked depth on $23.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that can take exits and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FUSE
FUSE is the token of Fuse Network — a payments-focused EVM chain that has been building merchant and stablecoin-payment tooling since before "payments chain" was a trend. The contract 0x126f5ece91d971f8ad62fa4fc1054456b8bd1111 is what our scan tracks: $326 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: Fuse is a long-running niche chain in the most contested lane in crypto — payments — competing against both crypto-native stablecoin rails and the incumbent card networks everyone claims to disrupt. The token is a bet on its specific merchant footprint compounding, and the modest pool means that bet is sized at small-cap terms.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LAVA or FUSE?
By tracked market cap: LAVA (Arbitrum) measures $8.18M and FUSE (Ethereum) measures $2.02M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LAVA or FUSE?
On the contract checks we publish: LAVA (Arbitrum) grades C and FUSE (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LAVA and FUSE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LAVA at −1.25% and FUSE at 0.00%.
More comparisons
RENDER vs LAVALAVA vs XBTLAVA vs MSUSDLVMON vs LAVAMSUSD vs FUSEXBT vs FUSERENDER vs FUSEFUSE vs 蝴蝶人生
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.