HostPOD vs MSUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
POD (Base) vs MSUSD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
POD vs MSUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| POD | MSUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.341 | $0.8929 |
| Market cap | $34.23M | $46.17M |
| 24h volume | $475.77K | $845.54K |
| Liquidity | $3.42M | $3.41M |
| FDV | $206.24M | $17.09M |
| Holders | 6,478 | 5,541 |
| Age (days) | 203 | 656 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- MSUSD measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of POD
- over the shared window POD moved −17.3% while MSUSD moved −0.57%
What the data says
POD
POD — listed under the name Dolphin — on Base at 0xed664536023d8e4b1640c394777d34abaff1df8f is a community token on the Coinbase-incubated layer-two chain, 203 days into its record at this snapshot. The September 26, 2026 read prices a $34.2 million market cap on a 500.0 million total supply, with a $206.2 million fully-diluted figure beside it — the wide gap between the two is the part of the float not yet circulating, which usually means locked, vested or treasury-held supply.
Liquidity is the strong half of the print: $3.4 million of tracked pool depth is deep for a cap this size, and $475.8 thousand of 24-hour volume is real flow rather than a dead chart. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a question for the live scan — a gap to verify, not a verdict to assume.
MSUSD
msUSD is Metronome Synth's synthetic dollar — you deposit volatile collateral (ETH, BTC wrappers) into the Synth engine and mint dollar-denominated synthetic positions against it. The contract 0x526728dbc96689597f85ae4cd716d4f7fccbae9d is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $3.4 million of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026.
The honest note, stated plainly: a synthetic dollar is not a stablecoin — msUSD can and does trade off its one-dollar mark (our current read shows it well below), because its price is set by pool dynamics and mint-redemption incentives, not by an issuer redeeming at par. That is a different risk class from USDC or USDT — hold it as a leveraged-collateral instrument, not as cash.
FAQ
Which is bigger, POD or MSUSD?
By tracked market cap: POD (Base) measures $34.23M and MSUSD (Base) measures $46.17M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, POD or MSUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: POD (Base) grades D and MSUSD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have POD and MSUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show POD at −17.3% and MSUSD at −0.57%.
More comparisons
REUSD vs PODPOD vs PENDLEPOD vs WBTCPOD vs GULDMSUSD vs PENDLEMSUSD vs WBTCMSUSD vs GULDREUSD vs MSUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.