HostREUSD vs MSUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
REUSD (Ethereum) vs MSUSD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
REUSD vs MSUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| REUSD | MSUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9848 | $0.8929 |
| Market cap | $46.87M | $46.17M |
| 24h volume | $1.79M | $845.54K |
| Liquidity | $13.13M | $3.41M |
| FDV | $46.87M | $17.09M |
| Holders | 448 | 5,541 |
| Age (days) | 543 | 656 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- REUSD measures ~3.8× the liquidity of MSUSD
- REUSD measures ~2.1× the 24h volume of MSUSD
- MSUSD measures ~12× the holder count of REUSD
- over the shared window REUSD moved −10.5% while MSUSD moved +29.0%
What the data says
REUSD
Resupply USD is the stablecoin Resupply Finance mints against Curve/Convex positions — a lending-market stable that routes its yield back to holders through the protocol's own machinery rather than a central custodian. The deployment 0x57ab1e0003f623289cd798b1824be09a793e4bec sits alongside its sibling reUSD issuance in this index; the September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $13 million of tracked pool liquidity across the pair set.
The honest shape: an overcollateralized DeFi stable trades the stablecoin trilemma directly — its peg quality is a function of the collateral book and the liquidation engine, both verifiable on-chain but neither guaranteed. What Resupply buys with that complexity is yield generation that doesn't route through an issuer's P&L.
MSUSD
msUSD is Metronome Synth's synthetic dollar — you deposit volatile collateral (ETH, BTC wrappers) into the Synth engine and mint dollar-denominated synthetic positions against it. The contract 0x526728dbc96689597f85ae4cd716d4f7fccbae9d is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $3.4 million of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026.
The honest note, stated plainly: a synthetic dollar is not a stablecoin — msUSD can and does trade off its one-dollar mark (our current read shows it well below), because its price is set by pool dynamics and mint-redemption incentives, not by an issuer redeeming at par. That is a different risk class from USDC or USDT — hold it as a leveraged-collateral instrument, not as cash.
FAQ
Which is bigger, REUSD or MSUSD?
By tracked market cap: REUSD (Ethereum) measures $46.87M and MSUSD (Base) measures $46.17M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, REUSD or MSUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: REUSD (Ethereum) grades C and MSUSD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have REUSD and MSUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show REUSD at −10.5% and MSUSD at +29.0%.
More comparisons
AZTEC vs REUSDREUSD vs USDGREUSD vs DIEMAGX vs REUSDPOD vs MSUSDMSUSD vs PENDLEMSUSD vs WBTCMSUSD vs GULD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.