HostMSETH vs SURPLUS — price, size and safety, side by side
MSETH (Base) vs SURPLUS (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
MSETH vs SURPLUS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MSETH | SURPLUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.38K | $0.00007181 |
| Market cap | $50.91M | $10.70M |
| 24h volume | $1.25M | $912.43K |
| Liquidity | $2.80M | $2.51M |
| FDV | $22.10M | $10.70M |
| Holders | 6,068 | 6,651 |
| Age (days) | 501 | 128 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- MSETH measures ~4.8× the market cap of SURPLUS
- over the shared window MSETH moved +0.01% while SURPLUS moved −32.9%
What the data says
MSETH
msETH is Metronome Synth's synthetic ether — a collateral-minted synthetic that tracks ETH's price through the Synth engine's mint-and-pool mechanics rather than by holding ether itself. The contract 0x7ba6f01772924a82d9626c126347a28299e98c98 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $2.8 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest note: msETH is not ETH and not a claim on ETH — synthetic assets trade at whatever the pool clears, which can sit far from the underlying's price (our current read has it at a steep discount to spot ether). Exposure through a synth is exposure to the synth's own liquidity and redemption mechanics first. If you want ETH on Base, bridged or wrapped ETH is the honest instrument; this is a different product.
SURPLUS
SURPLUS at 0xc52aedec3374422d7510e294cfaa90799595cba3 — styled Surplus Intelligence — is a young Base asset just 128 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $10.7 million market cap across a 100.0 billion supply.
What separates this row from the average young Base book is the pool: $2.5 million of tracked depth is deep relative to a $10.7 million cap — nearly a quarter of the valuation is matched by the exit book — on $912.4 thousand of 24-hour volume, an unusually busy tape for the age. The contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority posture is a live-scan question, not an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MSETH or SURPLUS?
By tracked market cap: MSETH (Base) measures $50.91M and SURPLUS (Base) measures $10.70M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MSETH or SURPLUS?
On the contract checks we publish: MSETH (Base) grades B and SURPLUS (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MSETH and SURPLUS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MSETH at +0.01% and SURPLUS at −32.9%.
More comparisons
SOL vs MSETHAUSD vs MSETHUB vs MSETHNPC vs MSETHADI vs SURPLUSSHIB vs SURPLUSSURPLUS vs 龙虾USDX vs SURPLUS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.