HostMETAC vs QUID — price, size and safety, side by side
METAC (Base) vs QUID (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
METAC vs QUID — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| METAC | QUID | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $748.09 | $0.07183 |
| Market cap | $1.99M | $10.28M |
| 24h volume | $5.11M | $534.41K |
| Liquidity | $470.23K | $436.06K |
| FDV | $2.03M | $71.83M |
| Holders | 2,525 | 14,990 |
| Age (days) | 39 | 16 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- QUID measures ~5.2× the market cap of METAC
- METAC measures ~9.6× the 24h volume of QUID
- QUID measures ~5.9× the holder count of METAC
What the data says
METAC
METAC on Base — 0xb2000000000000000000008bc8786b856e61707c — is another member of the 0xb200… tokenized-equity family: named "Meta Platforms Inc.", priced $669.44 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, in line with the underlying stock. $470 thousand of liquidity, roughly $9.9 million of daily volume.
One issuer, one family, many wrappers — that's the structural fact this page exists to state. Each stock-wrapped contract is a separate pool, a separate price, a separate point of failure, even though all share a deployer. The family's shared prefix makes verifying the issuer trivial; it also means a problem at the issuer is a problem for every member at once. Correlated counterparty risk is the cost of the convenience.
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the September 27, 2026 snapshot with $436 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
FAQ
Which is bigger, METAC or QUID?
By tracked market cap: METAC (Base) measures $1.99M and QUID (Base) measures $10.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, METAC or QUID?
On the contract checks we publish: METAC (Base) grades B and QUID (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have METAC and QUID performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show METAC at +11.8% and QUID at +10.8%.
More comparisons
CHIP vs METACMETAC vs BEMFLUID vs METACAUDIO vs METACQUID vs GMEXAPXUSD vs QUIDVOLLAR vs QUIDUVM vs QUID
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.