HostMCA vs SMON — price, size and safety, side by side
MCA (Monad) vs SMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
MCA vs SMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MCA | SMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000003199 | $0.02931 |
| Market cap | $3.51K | $2.23M |
| 24h volume | $165.56 | $159.50 |
| Liquidity | $2.30K | $1.80K |
| FDV | $3.20K | $2.23M |
| Holders | 2,837 | 4,846 |
| Age (days) | 298 | 301 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SMON measures ~634× the market cap of MCA
- SMON measures ~1.7× the holder count of MCA
- over the shared window MCA moved +9.69% while SMON moved 0.00%
What the data says
MCA
MCA gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. So the A here (85/100, 2026-09-26) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
On the market side, MCA brings deep liquidity of $2.30K, a holder base of 2,837 and a maturing record at 298 days as of 2026-09-26. The $2.30K pool stands up well to a ~$3.51K cap — depth like that means MCA absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. The 2,837-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that.
SMON
There's a small gap on this page — SMON's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-09-26. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, SMON carries thin liquidity of $1.80K, a holder base of 4,846 and 301 days old as of 2026-09-26. Set the $1.80K pool against roughly $2.23M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. 4,846 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MCA or SMON?
By tracked market cap: MCA (Monad) measures $3.51K and SMON (Monad) measures $2.23M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MCA or SMON?
On the contract checks we publish: MCA (Monad) grades A and SMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MCA and SMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MCA at +9.69% and SMON at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MCA vs SUSDEMCA vs HXROSTB vs MCAELIZAOS vs MCANVOX vs SMONGOOD vs SMONSOLID vs SMONSMON vs ACS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.