HostMARSCOIN vs CTM — price, size and safety, side by side
MARSCOIN (BNB Chain) vs CTM (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
MARSCOIN vs CTM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| MARSCOIN | CTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1412 | $0.2599 |
| Market cap | $104.54M | $1.06B |
| 24h volume | $3.27M | $1.89M |
| Liquidity | $1.40M | $1.76M |
| FDV | $104.49M | $77.01M |
| Holders | 49,777 | 4,956 |
| Age (days) | 53 | 174 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CTM measures ~10× the market cap of MARSCOIN
- MARSCOIN measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of CTM
- MARSCOIN measures ~10× the holder count of CTM
- over the shared window MARSCOIN moved +35.2% while CTM moved −8.46%
What the data says
MARSCOIN
MarsCoin (MARSCOIN) on BNB Chain at 0xfe189e97832da1573e4e4ff034f4ffc3a15c7777 is a revived space-themed ticker — the name goes back to one of crypto's older joke coins — 53 days into its current record at the September 21, 2026 snapshot. It carries a $104.5 million market cap on a 1.0 billion supply, 49,777 holders, and $3.3 million of 24-hour volume — a real, active mid-cap book by BNB Chain standards.
The contract posture is the clean kind this index likes to print: the contract cannot mint new supply, cannot freeze balances, and is not a proxy — grade A on the code read. Depth of $1.4 million is workable rather than deep against a nine-figure cap, and the ten largest wallets holding 60.6% of supply is the number worth watching — broad holder count, but the large wallets still hold most of the weight.
CTM
c8ntinuum (CTM) is a small-cap multi-chain protocol token whose contract 0xc8fb80fcc03f699c70ff0cc08c09106288888888 is deliberately vanity-shaped — the trailing 888888 is part of the address, not a typo. Our September 26, 2026 read shows $1.8 million of tracked pool liquidity, which is real depth for a token at this profile.
The honest note: at this scale, everything hinges on whether the protocol ships and sustains — the liquidity is present, but the holder base and the revenue surface are what to check before treating it as more than a speculative position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MARSCOIN or CTM?
By tracked market cap: MARSCOIN (BNB Chain) measures $104.54M and CTM (Ethereum) measures $1.06B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MARSCOIN or CTM?
On the contract checks we publish: MARSCOIN (BNB Chain) grades A and CTM (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MARSCOIN and CTM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show MARSCOIN at +35.2% and CTM at −8.46%.
More comparisons
G vs MARSCOINZCHF vs MARSCOINBSDETH vs MARSCOINTBTC vs MARSCOINCTM vs LINKDAI vs CTMCTM vs CRCLXWNEAR vs CTM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.