HostLINK.E vs SPCM — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK.E (Avalanche) vs SPCM (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
LINK.E vs SPCM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| LINK.E | SPCM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.08 | $0.0008204 |
| Market cap | $8.19B | $9.21M |
| 24h volume | $370.50M all venues | $260.56K all venues |
| Liquidity | $72.06K | $61.25K |
| FDV | $3.79M | $35.39M |
| Holders | 13,087 | 8,181 |
| Age (days) | 1,121 | 21 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~890× the market cap of SPCM
- LINK.E measures ~1,422× the 24h volume of SPCM
- LINK.E measures ~1.6× the holder count of SPCM
- over the shared window LINK.E moved −30.1% while SPCM moved +59.9%
What the data says
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $8.2 billion market cap dwarfs the $3.8 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $72.1 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SPCM
SPCM at 0x7cc9c624efa62c2decf0a2a028f7885ecea95a17 — SPACEM WORLD — is a three-day-old Avalanche book — 3 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $9.2 million market cap against a $35.4 million fully-diluted figure on 40.3 billion units.
The launch book is thin and the tape modest: $61.3 thousand of tracked depth on $4.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK.E or SPCM?
By tracked market cap: LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $8.19B and SPCM (Avalanche) measures $9.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK.E or SPCM?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C and SPCM (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK.E and SPCM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show LINK.E at −30.1% and SPCM at +59.9%.
More comparisons
LINK.E vs UNIUSDE vs LINK.ELINK.E vs TSATWLD vs LINK.EUNI vs SPCMSPCM vs TSATSPCM vs POLUSDE vs SPCM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.