HostLINK.E vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK.E (Avalanche) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-26.
LINK.E vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-25T21:34:55
| LINK.E | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $11.30 | $7.07 |
| Market cap | $9.64B | $4.61B |
| 24h volume | $7.12K DEX | $2.16M DEX |
| Liquidity | $89.47K | $26.90M |
| FDV | $4.65M | $6.54B |
| Holders | 13,087 | 383,059 |
| Age (days) | 1,121 | 1,745 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~2.1× the market cap of UNI
- UNI measures ~301× the liquidity of LINK.E
- UNI measures ~303× the 24h volume of LINK.E
- UNI measures ~29× the holder count of LINK.E
- over the shared window LINK.E moved −11.6% while UNI moved −21.7%
What the data says
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $9.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $4.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $89.5 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $26.9 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK.E or UNI?
By tracked market cap: LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $9.64B and UNI (Ethereum) measures $4.61B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK.E or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK.E and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-25T21:34:55, the measured snapshots show LINK.E at −11.6% and UNI at −21.7%.
More comparisons
LDO vs LINK.ELINK.E vs USDEAVAX vs LINK.EWLD vs LINK.EUNI vs USD1UNI vs SUSDETRUMP vs UNIAERO vs UNI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-25T21:34:55; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.