HostWLD vs LINK.E — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Ethereum) vs LINK.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
WLD vs LINK.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| WLD | LINK.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4352 | $11.30 |
| Market cap | $1.86B | $9.64B |
| 24h volume | $65.09K DEX | $7.12K DEX |
| Liquidity | $135.20K | $89.47K |
| FDV | $4.88B | $4.65M |
| Holders | 64,146 | 13,087 |
| Age (days) | 1,162 | 1,121 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~5.2× the market cap of WLD
- WLD measures ~1.5× the liquidity of LINK.E
- WLD measures ~9.1× the 24h volume of LINK.E
- WLD measures ~4.9× the holder count of LINK.E
What the data says
WLD
WLD — 0x163f8c2467924be0ae7b5347228cabf260318753 — is Worldcoin, the identity network's token distributed to people who let an orb scan their iris. Three years in, it remains one of the widest — and most divisive — distributions in crypto.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $1.9 billion market cap against a fully diluted valuation of $4.9 billion — only about a third of the eventual supply circulates, the rest still locked in the emissions schedule. Tracked on-chain depth is thin for the size at $135.2 thousand; WLD's real liquidity lives on centralized venues. Holders number 64,146, and the day prints -11.1%.
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $9.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $4.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $89.5 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or LINK.E?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Ethereum) measures $1.86B and LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $9.64B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or LINK.E?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Ethereum) grades C and LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and LINK.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show WLD at −21.0% and LINK.E at −20.7%.
More comparisons
LINK vs WLDWLD vs AVAXCAT vs WLDZRO vs WLDLDO vs LINK.ELINK.E vs UNILINK.E vs USDEAVAX vs LINK.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.