HostLGNS vs RLUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
LGNS (Polygon) vs RLUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
LGNS vs RLUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LGNS | RLUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.07 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | — | $2.42B |
| 24h volume | $7.32M | $37.63M |
| Liquidity | $50.25M | $42.14M |
| FDV | $7.04B | $1.36B |
| Holders | 2,547,218 | 12,580 |
| Age (days) | 929 | 52 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RLUSD measures ~5.1× the 24h volume of LGNS
- LGNS measures ~202× the holder count of RLUSD
What the data says
LGNS
Longinus (LGNS) is a Polygon token at 0xeb51d9a39ad5eef215dc0bf39a8821ff804a0f01, 929 days old at this snapshot dated September 27, 2026 — one of the older contracts the index tracks on the chain.
The row shows $50.3 million of tracked liquidity with $6.7 million traded in the last day across a supply of 6.3 billion tokens — a deep, active market by the numbers this index measured.
RLUSD
RLUSD is Ripple's dollar — the stablecoin Ripple built on its institutional distribution, aimed at the same regulated-treasury ground as USDC and PYUSD but arriving with an exchange network behind it. The deployment 0x8292bb45bf1ee4d140127049757c2e0ff06317ed is the Ethereum mint; our September 21, 2026 snapshot reads $42.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: RLUSD's reserve is the standard fiat-backed structure — cash and equivalents with attestations — so its risk profile is issuer-shaped (Ripple's solvency, NYDFS oversight, redemption terms) rather than exotic. What distinguishes it is distribution: Ripple's existing payment rails give it corridor utility most new stablecoins lack, though on pure DeFi depth it still trails the majors by an order of magnitude.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LGNS or RLUSD?
By tracked market cap: LGNS (Polygon) measures — and RLUSD (Ethereum) measures $2.42B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LGNS or RLUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: LGNS (Polygon) grades B and RLUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LGNS and RLUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LGNS at −6.52% and RLUSD at −1.86%.
More comparisons
WSTETH vs LGNSLGNS vs ETHLGNS vs GHSTLGNS vs USDGRLUSD vs USDGGHST vs RLUSDETH vs RLUSDRLUSD vs WBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.