HostLGNS vs GHST — price, size and safety, side by side
LGNS (Polygon) vs GHST (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
LGNS vs GHST — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| LGNS | GHST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.07 | $0.1014 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $7.32M | $3.20M |
| Liquidity | $50.25M | $43.18M |
| FDV | $7.04B | — |
| Holders | 2,547,218 | 31 |
| Age (days) | 929 | 237 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LGNS measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of GHST
- LGNS measures ~82,168× the holder count of GHST
What the data says
LGNS
Longinus (LGNS) is a Polygon token at 0xeb51d9a39ad5eef215dc0bf39a8821ff804a0f01, 929 days old at this snapshot dated September 27, 2026 — one of the older contracts the index tracks on the chain.
The row shows $50.3 million of tracked liquidity with $6.7 million traded in the last day across a supply of 6.3 billion tokens — a deep, active market by the numbers this index measured.
GHST
Start with the discrepancy, because on this row it is the useful part: the venue feed names this Base deployment "So4," while the ticker and slug in our index carry GHST — the name Aavegotchi's long-running game token trades under. At 0xac780b6e4ee50585df265c7766cc2bed51e43fb8, our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads about $43.2 million of tracked pool liquidity against roughly $3.2 million of recorded daily volume — a working level of turnover for a mid-cap game token.
Name mismatches between a feed and an index happen for boring reasons (a token rebrands upstream, a feed carries a different label) and for dangerous ones (a different asset wearing a famous ticker). The address is the arbiter: Aavegotchi's GHST is a known, years-old deployment, and whether this contract is the genuine Base deployment or an impersonation riding the name is a fact the address — never the ticker — settles. The live scanner above reads the contract directly and is the fastest way to confirm which case this is.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LGNS or GHST?
By tracked market cap: LGNS (Polygon) measures — and GHST (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LGNS or GHST?
On the contract checks we publish: LGNS (Polygon) grades B and GHST (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LGNS and GHST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show LGNS at 0.00% and GHST at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WSTETH vs LGNSLGNS vs ETHLGNS vs RLUSDLGNS vs USDGETH vs GHSTGHST vs RLUSDGHST vs USDGGHST vs WBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.