HostGHST vs RLUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
GHST (Base) vs RLUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
GHST vs RLUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| GHST | RLUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1014 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | — | $2.42B |
| 24h volume | $3.20M | $37.63M |
| Liquidity | $43.18M | $42.14M |
| FDV | — | $1.36B |
| Holders | 31 | 12,580 |
| Age (days) | 237 | 52 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RLUSD measures ~12× the 24h volume of GHST
- RLUSD measures ~406× the holder count of GHST
What the data says
GHST
Start with the discrepancy, because on this row it is the useful part: the venue feed names this Base deployment "So4," while the ticker and slug in our index carry GHST — the name Aavegotchi's long-running game token trades under. At 0xac780b6e4ee50585df265c7766cc2bed51e43fb8, our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads about $43.2 million of tracked pool liquidity against roughly $3.2 million of recorded daily volume — a working level of turnover for a mid-cap game token.
Name mismatches between a feed and an index happen for boring reasons (a token rebrands upstream, a feed carries a different label) and for dangerous ones (a different asset wearing a famous ticker). The address is the arbiter: Aavegotchi's GHST is a known, years-old deployment, and whether this contract is the genuine Base deployment or an impersonation riding the name is a fact the address — never the ticker — settles. The live scanner above reads the contract directly and is the fastest way to confirm which case this is.
RLUSD
RLUSD is Ripple's dollar — the stablecoin Ripple built on its institutional distribution, aimed at the same regulated-treasury ground as USDC and PYUSD but arriving with an exchange network behind it. The deployment 0x8292bb45bf1ee4d140127049757c2e0ff06317ed is the Ethereum mint; our September 21, 2026 snapshot reads $42.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: RLUSD's reserve is the standard fiat-backed structure — cash and equivalents with attestations — so its risk profile is issuer-shaped (Ripple's solvency, NYDFS oversight, redemption terms) rather than exotic. What distinguishes it is distribution: Ripple's existing payment rails give it corridor utility most new stablecoins lack, though on pure DeFi depth it still trails the majors by an order of magnitude.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHST or RLUSD?
By tracked market cap: GHST (Base) measures — and RLUSD (Ethereum) measures $2.42B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHST or RLUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: GHST (Base) grades A and RLUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHST and RLUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show GHST at 0.00% and RLUSD at +1.74%.
More comparisons
ETH vs GHSTGHST vs USDGGHST vs WBTCGHST vs PUMPRLUSD vs USDGETH vs RLUSDRLUSD vs WBTCRLUSD vs PUMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.