HostJUP vs ELEVATE — price, size and safety, side by side
JUP (Solana) vs ELEVATE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-26.
JUP vs ELEVATE — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-26T21:16:29
| JUP | ELEVATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2728 | $0.03302 |
| Market cap | $1.15B | $546.05M |
| 24h volume | $16.48M DEX | $659.60K DEX |
| Liquidity | $5.68M | $4.63M |
| FDV | $2.38B | $534.05M |
| Holders | 838,886 | 2,415 |
| Age (days) | — | 211 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- JUP measures ~2.1× the market cap of ELEVATE
- JUP measures ~25× the 24h volume of ELEVATE
- JUP measures ~347× the holder count of ELEVATE
- over the shared window JUP moved +13.0% while ELEVATE moved −64.0%
What the data says
JUP
JUP is the governance token of Jupiter, the aggregator that routes the majority of Solana's swap volume — including, full disclosure, many of the swaps on this site. That makes it one of the few large Solana tokens whose underlying "business" is directly observable on-chain: every day's routed volume is public, and the token's relevance rises and falls with it. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, JUP carries roughly $1.1 billion of market capitalization across 838,886 holders at mint JUPyiwrYJFskUPiHa7hkeR8VUtAeFoSYbKedZNsDvCN.
The structural read is clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. No one can inflate the supply by fiat and no one can lock a holder's tokens — the two failure modes that account for most of the wreckage this site catalogues. Distribution is genuinely broad; an 800-thousand-wallet base came from one of the largest airdrop programs in Solana's history, which spread ownership widely but also created recurring, scheduled moments of sell pressure as later distribution rounds unlocked. Supply events like that are public calendar items, not hidden risks, but they are worth knowing about before reading any chart move as organic.
ELEVATE
Elevate is a mid-cap Ethereum token whose name carries the usual promise of its genre — the contract 0x888888888887715fb9d9f84175af9e6cce46807e is this row's identity, and our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $4.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest note for this shape of asset: at this depth the page's job is the same as every ungraded-check page's — verify the contract, check the mint/freeze controls, look at the holder distribution — because a name like Elevate tells a buyer nothing about what the token actually does or who stands behind it. The figures above are what's measurable; the project's own documentation is what's not.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JUP or ELEVATE?
By tracked market cap: JUP (Solana) measures $1.15B and ELEVATE (Ethereum) measures $546.05M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JUP or ELEVATE?
On the contract checks we publish: JUP (Solana) grades A and ELEVATE (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JUP and ELEVATE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-26T21:16:29, the measured snapshots show JUP at +13.0% and ELEVATE at −64.0%.
More comparisons
EUROC vs JUPJUP vs PENGUSPX vs JUPENA vs JUPPENGU vs ELEVATEELEVATE vs PSTELEVATE vs DRVELEVATE vs ASTER
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-26T21:16:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.