Open app

PENGU vs ELEVATE — price, size and safety, side by side

PENGU (Solana) vs ELEVATE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-26.

PENGUA

$0.007423
Pudgy Penguins on Solana
Trade PENGU
vs

ELEVATEB

$0.03302
Elevate on Ethereum
Trade ELEVATE

PENGU vs ELEVATE — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-26T21:16:29

100 — shared start
PENGU −9.97%  ·  ELEVATE −64.0% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
PENGUELEVATE
Price$0.007423$0.03302
Market cap$776.51M$546.05M
24h volume$19.04M DEX$659.60K DEX
Liquidity$5.00M$4.63M
FDV$776.51M$534.05M
Holders559,4922,415
Age (days)—211
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

PENGU

PENGU is what happens when an NFT brand outgrows its JPEGs. Pudgy Penguins spent years building the rare thing in crypto — mainstream distribution, from viral GIF packs to toys on retail shelves — and in December 2024 attached a token to that brand with one of the widest airdrops Solana has hosted. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, PENGU carries roughly $776.5 million of market capitalization across 559,492 holders at mint 2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv.

The chain-level mechanics read clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Supply is fixed at what exists, and no authority can freeze a wallet out of selling — the two structural failures behind most of the losses this site documents, both absent here. A holder base above half a million wallets, seeded by the airdrop, means ownership is broad in a way most brand tokens never achieve; broad bases don't prevent drawdowns, but they make single-wallet price control much harder.

Full PENGU safety read →

ELEVATE

Elevate is a mid-cap Ethereum token whose name carries the usual promise of its genre — the contract 0x888888888887715fb9d9f84175af9e6cce46807e is this row's identity, and our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $4.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.

The honest note for this shape of asset: at this depth the page's job is the same as every ungraded-check page's — verify the contract, check the mint/freeze controls, look at the holder distribution — because a name like Elevate tells a buyer nothing about what the token actually does or who stands behind it. The figures above are what's measurable; the project's own documentation is what's not.

Full ELEVATE safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, PENGU or ELEVATE?

By tracked market cap: PENGU (Solana) measures $776.51M and ELEVATE (Ethereum) measures $546.05M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, PENGU or ELEVATE?

On the contract checks we publish: PENGU (Solana) grades A and ELEVATE (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have PENGU and ELEVATE performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-26T21:16:29, the measured snapshots show PENGU at −9.97% and ELEVATE at −64.0%.

More comparisons

JUP vs PENGUEUROC vs PENGUPENGU vs PSTPENGU vs DRVELEVATE vs PSTELEVATE vs DRVELEVATE vs ASTERELEVATE vs XRP

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-26T21:16:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.