HostPENGU vs PST — price, size and safety, side by side
PENGU (Solana) vs PST (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
PENGU vs PST — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| PENGU | PST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.007423 | $1.14 |
| Market cap | $776.51M | $383.37M |
| 24h volume | $19.04M DEX | $1.15M DEX |
| Liquidity | $5.00M | $3.78M |
| FDV | $776.51M | $383.37M |
| Holders | 559,492 | 4,155 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PENGU measures ~2.0× the market cap of PST
- PENGU measures ~16× the 24h volume of PST
- PENGU measures ~135× the holder count of PST
- over the shared window PENGU moved −10.1% while PST moved +0.97%
What the data says
PENGU
PENGU is what happens when an NFT brand outgrows its JPEGs. Pudgy Penguins spent years building the rare thing in crypto — mainstream distribution, from viral GIF packs to toys on retail shelves — and in December 2024 attached a token to that brand with one of the widest airdrops Solana has hosted. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, PENGU carries roughly $776.5 million of market capitalization across 559,492 holders at mint 2zMMhcVQEXDtdE6vsFS7S7D5oUodfJHE8vd1gnBouauv.
The chain-level mechanics read clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Supply is fixed at what exists, and no authority can freeze a wallet out of selling — the two structural failures behind most of the losses this site documents, both absent here. A holder base above half a million wallets, seeded by the airdrop, means ownership is broad in a way most brand tokens never achieve; broad bases don't prevent drawdowns, but they make single-wallet price control much harder.
PST
PST is PayFi's strategy token — a USDC-denominated position that routes deposits into payment-finance yield (the spread on moving money across borders and settlement rails), another real-world-cashflow token in the RWA mold. The mint 59obFNBzyTBGowrkif5uK7ojS58vsuWz3ZCvg6tfZAGw is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $3.8 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: payment-finance yield is real commercial activity — remittance float, settlement timing spreads — so PST's return isn't printed from token emissions; it's also an off-chain book the chain can't verify, and the token is ultimately a claim on PayFi's operation of that book. The A grade is a contract verdict; the strategy is a counterparty.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PENGU or PST?
By tracked market cap: PENGU (Solana) measures $776.51M and PST (Solana) measures $383.37M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PENGU or PST?
On the contract checks we publish: PENGU (Solana) grades A and PST (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PENGU and PST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show PENGU at −10.1% and PST at +0.97%.
More comparisons
PENGU vs ELEVATEJUP vs PENGUEUROC vs PENGUPENGU vs DRVPST vs DRVPST vs ASTERPST vs XRPPST vs USD0
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.