HostENA vs JUP — price, size and safety, side by side
ENA (Ethereum) vs JUP (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-26 / 2026-10-27.
ENA vs JUP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-26T21:16:29
| ENA | JUP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2062 | $0.2728 |
| Market cap | $2.91B | $1.15B |
| 24h volume | $3.46M DEX | $16.48M DEX |
| Liquidity | $6.72M | $5.68M |
| FDV | $3.26B | $2.38B |
| Holders | — | 838,886 |
| Age (days) | 902 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ENA measures ~2.5× the market cap of JUP
- JUP measures ~4.8× the 24h volume of ENA
- over the shared window ENA moved −8.63% while JUP moved +13.0%
What the data says
ENA
ENA is Ethena's governance token — the asset of the protocol behind USDe, the synthetic dollar that became one of the largest stables on earth by running a delta-neutral hedge rather than holding cash. The deployment 0x57e114b691db790c35207b2e685d4a43181e6061 is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $6.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest shape: ENA's value rides on USDe's durability — a bet on the hedge machinery surviving the negative-funding stress case it was designed for but hasn't fully faced — plus the fee economics of Ethena's stack (USDe, sUSDe, USDtb, and now USDat). It's a governance claim on real, measurable protocol revenue, which puts it a tier above pure attention assets while keeping the tail risk its whole design carries.
JUP
JUP is the governance token of Jupiter, the aggregator that routes the majority of Solana's swap volume — including, full disclosure, many of the swaps on this site. That makes it one of the few large Solana tokens whose underlying "business" is directly observable on-chain: every day's routed volume is public, and the token's relevance rises and falls with it. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, JUP carries roughly $1.1 billion of market capitalization across 838,886 holders at mint JUPyiwrYJFskUPiHa7hkeR8VUtAeFoSYbKedZNsDvCN.
The structural read is clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. No one can inflate the supply by fiat and no one can lock a holder's tokens — the two failure modes that account for most of the wreckage this site catalogues. Distribution is genuinely broad; an 800-thousand-wallet base came from one of the largest airdrop programs in Solana's history, which spread ownership widely but also created recurring, scheduled moments of sell pressure as later distribution rounds unlocked. Supply events like that are public calendar items, not hidden risks, but they are worth knowing about before reading any chart move as organic.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ENA or JUP?
By tracked market cap: ENA (Ethereum) measures $2.91B and JUP (Solana) measures $1.15B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ENA or JUP?
On the contract checks we publish: ENA (Ethereum) grades B and JUP (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ENA and JUP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-26T21:16:29, the measured snapshots show ENA at −8.63% and JUP at +13.0%.
More comparisons
JLP vs ENAENA vs SPXSKY vs ENASUSDAI vs ENAEUROC vs JUPJUP vs PENGUSPX vs JUPJUP vs ELEVATE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-26T21:16:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.