HostGMX vs CBBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
GMX (Arbitrum) vs CBBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
GMX vs CBBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GMX | CBBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.47 | $84.19K |
| Market cap | $88.56M | $8.28B |
| 24h volume | $174.01K | $14.11M |
| Liquidity | $2.61M | $90.85M |
| FDV | $93.01M | $4.16B |
| Holders | 297,779 | 88,613 |
| Age (days) | 194 | 368 |
| Safety grade | D | B |
Where they differ
- CBBTC measures ~93× the market cap of GMX
- CBBTC measures ~35× the liquidity of GMX
- CBBTC measures ~81× the 24h volume of GMX
- GMX measures ~3.4× the holder count of CBBTC
What the data says
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices an $88.6 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $93.0 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $2.6 million of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
CBBTC
CBBTC — "Coinbase Wrapped BTC" on Ethereum, 0xcbb7c0000ab88b473b1f5afd9ef808440eed33bf — is Coinbase's custodied bitcoin wrapper: each unit a claim on BTC held by the exchange's custody arm.
The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $90.9 million of liquidity against an $8.06 billion market cap, roughly $5.7 million of daily volume, at an $81,540 unit price that tracks BTC spot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMX or CBBTC?
By tracked market cap: GMX (Arbitrum) measures $88.56M and CBBTC (Ethereum) measures $8.28B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMX or CBBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: GMX (Arbitrum) grades D and CBBTC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMX and CBBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GMX at +4.16% and CBBTC at +0.33%.
More comparisons
GMX vs SYRUPUSDCGMX vs NVDABHYUSD vs GMXKMNO vs GMXFWWBTC vs CBBTCETH vs CBBTCGALABET vs CBBTCNODA vs CBBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.