HostGMT vs UVM — price, size and safety, side by side
GMT (Polygon) vs UVM (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
GMT vs UVM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GMT | UVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008854 | $0.3952 |
| Market cap | $25.94M | $766.92M |
| 24h volume | $30.20K | $7.02K |
| Liquidity | $621.92K | $440.27K |
| FDV | $16.23M | $712.87M |
| Holders | 46,298 | 2,858 |
| Age (days) | 963 | 601 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- UVM measures ~30× the market cap of GMT
- GMT measures ~4.3× the 24h volume of UVM
- GMT measures ~16× the holder count of UVM
What the data says
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The September 26, 2026 snapshot prices a $25.9 million market cap against a $16.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $621.9 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
UVM
UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $440.3 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GMT or UVM?
By tracked market cap: GMT (Polygon) measures $25.94M and UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GMT or UVM?
On the contract checks we publish: GMT (Polygon) grades B and UVM (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GMT and UVM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GMT at +6.22% and UVM at +7.17%.
More comparisons
CES vs GMTLAPTOP vs GMTGMT vs APXUSDJTO vs GMTRENBTC vs UVMUVM vs VOLLARUVM vs APXUSDDADDY vs UVM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.